Evolución de la cesárea en Colombia y su asociación con la naturaleza jurídica de la institución donde se atiende el parto

Hoxha I, Fink G. Caesarean sections and health financing: A global analysis. BMJ Open. 2021;11(5):e044383. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044383

Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller A-B, Zhang J, Gülmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: Global, regional and national estimates: 1990-2014. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0148343. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148343

Souza JP, Gülmezoglu A, Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Carroli G, Fawole B, et al. Caesarean section without medical indications is associated with an increased risk of adverse short-term maternal outcomes: The 2004-2008 WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health. BMC Med. 2010;8(1):71. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-8-71

Keag OE, Norman JE, Stock SJ. Long-term risks and benefits associated with cesarean delivery for mother, baby, and subsequent pregnancies: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Myers JE, editor. PLOS Med. 2018;15(1):e1002494. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002494

Sobhy S, Arroyo-Manzano D, Murugesu N, Karthikeyan G, Kumar V, Kaur I, et al. Maternal and perinatal mortality and complications associated with caesarean section in low-income and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2019;393(10184):1973-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32386-9

Mascarello KC, Horta BL, Silveira MF. Maternal complications and cesarean section without indication: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Rev Saude Publica. 2017;51:105. https://doi.org/10.11606/S1518-8787.2017051000389

Sandall J, Tribe RM, Avery L, Mola G, Visser GH, Homer CS, et al. Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children. Lancet. 2018 Oct;392(10155):1349-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31930-5

Declercq E, Young R, Cabral H, Ecker J. Is a rising cesarean delivery rate inevitable? Trends in industrialized countries, 1987 to 2007. Birth. 2011;38(2):99-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00459.x

Boerma T, Ronsmans C, Melesse DY, Barros AJD, Barros FC, Juan L, et al. Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1341-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31928-7

Laurita Longo V, Odjidja EN, Beia TK, Neri M, Kielmann K, Gittardi I, et al. “An unnecessary cut?” multilevel health systems analysis of drivers of caesarean sections rates in Italy: A systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):770. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03462-1

Dahlen HG, Tracy S, Tracy M, Bisits A, Brown C, Thornton C. Rates of obstetric intervention among low-risk women giving birth in private and public hospitals in NSW: A population-based descriptive study. BMJ Open. 2012;2(5). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001723

Hoxha I, Syrogiannouli L, Luta X, Tal K, Goodman DC, da Costa BR, et al. Caesarean sections and for-profit status of hospitals: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2017;7(2):e013670. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013670

Sk R. Does delivery in private hospitals contribute largely to Caesarean Section births? A path analysis using generalised structural equation modelling. PLoS One. 2020;15(10):e0239649. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239649

Betran AP, Ye J, Moller A-B, Souza JP, Zhang J. Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: Global and regional estimates. BMJ Glob Heal. 2021;6(6). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005671

Uribe-Leitz T, Barrero-Castillero A, Cervantes-Trejo A, Santos JM, de la Rosa-Rabago A, Lipsitz SR, et al. Trends of caesarean delivery from 2008 to 2017, Mexico. Bull World Health Organ. 2019;97(7):502-12. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.18.224303

Niino Y. The increasing cesarean rate globally and what we can do about it. Biosci Trends. 2011;5(4):139-50. https://doi.org/10.5582/bst.2011.v5.4.139

McCall SJ, Semaan A, Altijani N, Opondo C, Abdel-Fattah M, Kabakian-Khasholian T. Trends, wealth inequalities and the role of the private sector in caesarean section in the Middle East and North Africa: A repeat cross-sectional analysis of population-based surveys. PLoS One. 2021;16(11):e0259791. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259791

Rubio-Romero JA, Fonseca-Pérez JE, Molina S, Buitrago Leal M, Zuleta-Tobon JJ, et al. Racionalización del uso de la cesárea en Colombia. Consenso de la Federación Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecología (Fecolsog) y la Federación Colombiana de Perinatología (Fecopen). Bogotá, 2014. Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol. 2014;65(2):139-51. https://doi.org/10.18597/rcog.62

Murray SF. Relation between private health insurance and high rates of caesarean section in Chile: Qualitative and quantitative study. BMJ. 2000;321(7275):1501-5. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.321.7275.1501

Gibbons L, Belizán JM, Lauer JA, Betrán AP, Merialdi M, Althabe F. The global numbers and costs of additionally needed and unnecessary caesarean sections performed per year: Overuse as a barrier to universal coverage [Internet]. 2010. Disponible en: https://www.who.int/healthsystems/topics/financing/healthreport/30C-sectioncosts.pdf

Nakamura-Pereira M, do Carmo Leal M, Esteves-Pereira AP, Domingues RMSM, Torres JA, Dias MAB, et al. Use of Robson classification to assess cesarean section rate in Brazil: The role of source of payment for childbirth. Reprod Health. 2016;13(Suppl 3):128. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-016-0228-7

Alfonso EA, Arcila AD, Latorre ML. Atlas de variaciones geográficas en salud de Colombia [Internet]. Bogotá: Ministerio de Salud; s. f. Disponible en: https://www.minsalud.gov.co/sites/rid/Lists/BibliotecaDigital/RIDE/DE/PES/atlas-variaciones-geograficas-salud2.pdf