Comparison of the implementation of the Extreme Maternal Morbidity Surveillance Model in 12 Health Institutions in Colombia, 2013. Mixed study: qualitative and quantitative

Authors

  • Jorge Martín Rodríguez-Hernández
  • Katerine Ariza-Ruiz
  • Jeannette Liliana Amaya-Lara
  • María Alexandra Matallana-Gómez
  • María Margarita Ronderos-Torres
  • Rolando Enrique Peñaloza-Quintero

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18597/rcog.290

Keywords:

Pregnant women, morbidity, maternal mortality, Colombia

Abstract

Objective: To compare the level of implementation of the Extreme Maternal Morbidity Surveillance Model (EMMSM). and the main barriers and facilitators to the implementation in two groups of Healthcare Service Providers (HSP) in Colombia.

Materials and methods: Mixed study using quantitative (semi-structured tool) and qualitative (In-depth interview) information techniques. The healthcare service providers in which the pilot model was implemented (pHSP) were compared with another group of healthcare institutions that did not participate in the initial implementation, hereinafter called control HSP (cHSP). They were are all selected jointly with the Ministry of Health (MoH) based on convenience. The level of implementation is presented in terms of proportions for each healthcare institution. The information was crossed-referenced in order to supplement the data of the various components of the EMMSM implementation.

Results: Differences in implementation were found for each IPS group. In the IPSP there was greater dissemination of the protocols, detection, notification, information flows and decision-making.

In the IPSC group there were more difficulties in determining main causes, defining avoidability criteria, and identifying delays. The numbers of 
professional staff, mean monthly hours and profiles were higher among the IPSP when compared with the IPSC. The level of implementation among the
healthcare providers in the IPSP group ranged between 73 % and 94 %, and between 41 % and 90 % in the IPSC group. There was greater clarity
among the IPSP regarding the role of the MVMME as a tool for quality improvement in care provided to pregnant women. Among the IPSC, although the model was considered a means to improve quality, it was perceived as work overload. 

Conclusions: The higher degree of development among the IPSP may be associated with a higher level of support from the MOH and the United Nations Fund for Population Activities (UNPFA), and greater political and institutional support for the implementation.

Author Biographies

Jorge Martín Rodríguez-Hernández

Médico Cirujano; Maestría en Ciencias en Epidemiología; Doctor en Ciencias de la Salud Pública con área de concentración en Epidemiología. Profesor Investigador, Centro de Proyectos para el Desarrollo, Cendex, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá (Colombia).

Katerine Ariza-Ruiz

Antropóloga; Maestría en Investigación Social Interdisciplinaria, Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas, Bogotá (Colombia).

Jeannette Liliana Amaya-Lara

Estadística; Magíster en Economía. Profesor Investigador, Centro de Proyectos para el Desarrollo, Cendex, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá (Colombia).

María Alexandra Matallana-Gómez

Odontóloga; Especialización en Gestión de Talento Humano y en Administración Hospitalaria; Maestría en Salud Pública (C). Profesor Investigador, Centro de Proyectos para el Desarrollo, Cendex, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá (Colombia).

María Margarita Ronderos-Torres

Médico cirujano; Maestrías en Salud Pública y en Epidemiología. Jefa del Departamento de Medicina Preventiva y Social, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá (Colombia).

Rolando Enrique Peñaloza-Quintero

Odontólogo; Especialista en Política Social y en Administración en Salud con énfasis en Seguridad Social; Magíster y docente en Estudios Políticos. Profesor Investigador, Centro de Proyectos para el Desarrollo, Cendex, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá (Colombia).

References

Mejía A, Téllez G, González A. Morbilidad materna extrema (near miss) y muertes maternas. Archivos de investigación Materno Infantil. 2012;3:146-53.

Souza J, Cecatti J, Faundes A, Morais S, Villa J, Carroli G, et al. Maternal near miss and maternal death in the World Health Organization’s 2005 global survey on maternal and perinatal health. Bull World Health Organ. 2005:113-19.

Ronsmans CW. Maternal mortality: who, when, where and why. Lancet. 2006;368:1189-2000.

Organización Mundial de la Salud. Mortalidad materna en el mundo. Informe 348. Mayo de 2014. [Visitado 2013 Oct 20]. Recuperado de http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs348/es/.

Say L, Souza P, Pattinson R. Maternal near miss–towards a standard tool for monitoring quality of maternal health care. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2009;23:287-96.

World Health Organization. Maternal Mortality in 2005 estimates developed by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA and The World Bank. Genève; 2007.

Organización Panamericana de la salud, Organización Mundial de la Salud. Plan de acción para acelerar la reducción de la mortalidad materna y la morbilidad materna grave. Washington, D.C.; 2011.

Campbell OMR, Graham WJ. On behalf of The Lancet Maternal Survival Series steering group. Strategies for reducing maternal mortality: getting on with what Works. Lancet. 2006;368:1284-99.

Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social; Dirección de Demografía y Epidemiología; Grupos ASIS; 2013. [Visitado 2013 Nov 11]. Disponible en: http: //www.minsalud.gov.co/Documentos%20y%20Publicaciones/Análisis%20de%20situación%20de%20salud%20por%20regiones.pdf.

Naciones Unidas. Objetivos de Desarrollo del Milenio. Informe de 2013. New York; 2013.

Profamilia. Encuesta Nacional Demografía y Salud-ENDS. Bogotá; 2010.

Cecatti J, Souza J, Oliveira A, Parpinelli M, Sousa M, Say L, et al. Pre-validation of the WHO organ dysfunction based criteria for identification of maternal near miss. Reproductive Health. 2011:8-22.

Stones W, Lim W, Al-Azzawi F, Kelly M. An investigation of maternal morbidity with identification of life-threatening ‘near miss’ episodes. Health Trends. 1991;23:13-5.

Richard F, Ouédraogo C, Zongo V, Ouattara F, Zongo S, Gruénais M, et al. The difficulty of questioning clinical practice: experience of facility-based case reviews in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. BJOG. 2009;116:38-44.

Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social. Fondo de Poblaciones de las Naciones Unidas (UNFPA). Vigilancia de la morbilidad materna extrema. Bogotá: Legis; 2010.

Reason J, Carthey J, De Leval MR. Diagnosing “vulnerable system syndrome”: an essential prerequisite to effective risk management. Qual Health Care. 2001;10 Suppl 2:21-5.

Bonilla-Castro E, Rodríguez Sehk P. Más allá del dilema de los métodos: la investigación en ciencias sociales. 3 ed. Bogotá: Norma; 2005.

Fernandez-Sampieri R, Fernandez-Collado C, Baptista-Lucio P. Los métodos mixtos en metodología de la investigación. 6 ed. México: McGraw Hill Education; 2014.

Creswell JW. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 4 ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2013.

Hutchinson C, Lange I, Kanhonou L, Filippi V, Borchert M. Exploring the sustainability of obstetric near-miss case reviews: a qualitative study in the South of Benin. Midwifery. 2010;26:537-43.

Filippi V, Brugha R, Browne E, Gohou V, Bacci A, De Brouwere V, et al. How to do (or not to do). Obstetric audit in resource-poor settings: lessons from a multicountry project auditing ‘near miss’ obstetrical emergencies. Health Policy and Planning. 2004;19:57-66.

Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Módulos de principios de epidemiología para el control de enfermedades. Vigilancia en salud pública. Unidad 4. 2 ed. Washington D.C.; 2002.

Organización Panamericana de la salud. Ministerio de la Protección Social. Sistema de información para la vigilancia en salud pública: propuesta conceptual y tecnológica. Bogotá D.C.; 2005.

Muffler N, Trabelssi H, De Brouwere V. Scaling up clinical audits of obstetric cases in Morocco. Tropical Medicine and International Health. 2007;12:1248-57.

Gerein N, Green A, Pearson S. The Implications of Shortages of Health Professionals for Maternal Health in Sub-Saharan Africa. Reproductive Health Matters. 2006;14:40-50.

Shiff J, Smith S. Generation of political priority for global health initiatives: a framework and case study of maternal mortality. Lancet. 2007;370:1370-79.

Thaddeus S, Maine D. Too far to walk: maternal mortality in context. Social Science & Medicine. 1994;38:1091-110.

González L, Gómez R, Vélez G, Agudelo S, Gómez J, Wylie J. Características de la atención hospitalaria y su relación con la morbilidad materna extrema en Medellín, Colombia. Rev Panam Salud Pública. 2014;35:15-22.

Wehby G, Murray J, Castilla E, Lopez J, Ohsfeldt R. Prenatal care effectiveness and utilization in Brazil. Health Policy and Planning. 2009;24:175-88.

Bourdieu P. The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature. Cambridge: Polity; 1993.

Periódico el Colombiano. Medellín pierde camas para la atención de partos. Febrero de 2013. [Visitado 2014 Ago 25]. Disponible en: http://m.elcolombiano.com/article/117366.

Filippi V, Ronsmans C, Campbell O, Graham W, Mills A, Borghi J, et al. Maternal health in poor countries: the broader context and a call for action. Lancet. 2006;368:1535-41.

Hussein J, Kanguru L, Astin M, Munjanja S. The Effectiveness of Emergency Obstetric Referral Interventions in Developing Country Settings: A Systematic Review. PLoS Med. 2012;9:e1001264.doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001264.

Knight M, Kurinczuc J, Spark P. Inequalities in maternal health: national cohort study of ethnic variation in severe maternal morbidities. Br Med J. 2009;338:1-7.

How to Cite

1.
Rodríguez-Hernández JM, Ariza-Ruiz K, Amaya-Lara JL, Matallana-Gómez MA, Ronderos-Torres MM, Peñaloza-Quintero RE. Comparison of the implementation of the Extreme Maternal Morbidity Surveillance Model in 12 Health Institutions in Colombia, 2013. Mixed study: qualitative and quantitative. Rev. colomb. obstet. ginecol. [Internet]. 2015 Dec. 21 [cited 2024 May 17];66(4):229-41. Available from: https://revista.fecolsog.org/index.php/rcog/article/view/290

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2015-12-21

Issue

Section

Original Research
QR Code

Altmetric

Article metrics
Abstract views
Galley vies
PDF Views
HTML views
Other views
Crossref Cited-by logo

Some similar items: