Validity of urinalysis and Gram staining in the diagnosis of urinary tract infections in pregnancy. Hospital Simón Bolívar, Bogotá, Colombia, 2009-2010

Authors

  • Andrés Reyes-Hurtado
  • Ana Gómez-Ríos
  • Jorge A. Rodríguez-Ortiz

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18597/rcog.130

Keywords:

Urinary tract infections, diagnosis, pregnancy

Abstract

Objective: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of urinalysis and Gram staining the diagnosis of urinary tract infection (UTI) in pregnancy.

Materials and methods: Diagnostic validity study in pregnant women with a high suspicion of UTI, hospitalized in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Service of the Simon Bolivar Hospital, a Level III center, between January 1st 2009 and December 31st 2010. Gram staining and urinalysis with its parameters (leukocyte esterase, bacteriuria, leukocyturia, nitrites) were compared with urine culture, considered as the gold standard test. Specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV) and probability ratios (LR + and PR -) were calculated. A non-probabilistic sampling was done out of convenience. The sample size was calculated using the Epidat 4.0, with a minimum expected sensitivity of 90% and a confidence level of 90% for the prevalence of 20% established in the literature.

Results: Of the total of 212 samples of pregnant women included in the study, 115 (54%) had a positive urine culture and 97 (46%) had a negative culture. Seventy-eight per cent of patients presented with pyelonephritis, while 22% presented with low UTI (cystourethritis). The most frequent germ was Escherichia coli, found in 70% of patients. Gram stain had a sensitivity of 74% (95% CI: 65-81) and a specificity of 86% (95% CI: 78-92); urinalysis had a sensitivity of 21% (95% CI: 14-29) and a specificity of 92% (95% CI: 84-96).

Conclusion: Rapid tests done in the emergency room showed high specificity for the diagnosis of UTI in pregnant women. Gram staining is the test with the highest sensitivity for the diagnosis of UTI in this population at Hospital Simón Bolívar.

Author Biographies

Andrés Reyes-Hurtado

Ginecoobstetra, Universidad El Bosque. Bogotá, Colombia.

Ana Gómez-Ríos

Residente IV año Ginecología y Obstetricia, Universidad El Bosque. Bogotá, Colombia.

Jorge A. Rodríguez-Ortiz

Ginecoobstetra. Epidemiólogo Clínico, Hospital Simón Bolívar. Profesor asociado Universidad El Bosque. Docente Universidad de La Sabana. Bogotá, Colombia.

References

Ferreira FE, Olaya SX, Zúñiga P, Angulo M. Infección urinaria durante el embarazo, perfil de resistencia bacteriana al tratamiento en el Hospital General de Neiva, Colombia. Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol 2005;56:239-43.

Schnarr J, Smaill F. Asymptomatic Bacteriuria and Symptomatic Urinary Tract Infections In Pregnancy. Eur J Clin Invest 2008;38:S50-7.

Hamdan HZ, Ziad AH, Ali SK, Adam I. Epidemiology of Urinary Tract Infections and Antibiotics Sensitivity Among Pregnant Women At Khartoum North Hospital. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 2011;10:2.

Macejko AM, Schaeffer AJ. Asymptomatic Bacteriuria and Symptomatic Urinary Tract Infections During Pregnancy. Urol Clin North Am 2007;34:35-42.

Florentin L, Lascurain A, Báez D, Martínez M, Troche A. Consenso de infección urinaria: pautas de diagnóstico y tratamiento. Pediatr (Asunción) 2011;38:68-72.

Abarzúa F, Zajer C, Donoso B, Belmar C, Riveros JP, González P, et al. Reevaluación de la sensibilidad antimicrobiana de patógenos urinarios en el embarazo. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol 2002;67:226-31.

Alvarez G, Echeverría J, Garau A, Lens V. Infección Urinaria y embarazo. Diagnóstico y terapéutica. Rev posgrado VIa Cátedra Med 2006;150:20-3.

Pino T, Sabina A. Evaluación de la prescripción de gentamicina en gestantes ingresadas con infección del tracto urinario. Rev Cubana Obstet Ginecol 2005;31.

Norris DL, Young JD. Urinary Tract Infections: Diagnosis And Management In The Emergency Department. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2008;26:413-30.

Gupta K, Hooton TM, Stamm WE. Increasing Antimicrobial Resistance and the Management of Uncomplicated Community-Acquired Urinary Tract Infections. Ann Intern Med 2001;135:41-50.

Arroyave V, Cardona A, Castaño JJ, Giraldo V, Jaramillo M, Moncada N, et al. Caracterización de la infección de vías urinarias en mujeres embarazadas atendidas en una unidad de primer nivel de atención (Manizales, Colombia), 2006-2010. Arch Med (Manizales) 2011;11:39-50.

Mittal P, Wing DA. Urinar y Tract Infections in Pregnancy. Clin Perinatol 2005;32:749-64.

Ovalle A, Levancini M. Urinary Tract Infections in Pregnancy. Curr Opin Urol 2001;11:55-9.

Shrotri KN, Morrison ID, Shrotri NC. Urological Conditions in Pregnancy: A Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenge. J Obstet Gynaecol 2007;27:648-54.

Thomas AA, Thomas AZ, Campbell SC, Palmer JS. Urologic Emergencies in Pregnancy. Urology 2010;76:453-60.

Johnson EK, Kim ED. Urinary Tract Infections in Pregnancy [en línea] 2009. Visitado 2012 Abr 1. Disponible en: http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/452604-overview

Bachman JW, Heise RH, Naessens JM, Timmerman MG. A study of various tests to detect asymptomatic urinary tract infections in an obstetric population. JAMA 1993;270:1971-4.

Mandell D. Bennett’s Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases, 7th Ed. Urinary Tract Infection In Pregnancy [en línea] 2009. Visitado 2012 Abr 1. Disponible en: http://www.mdconsult.com/books/page.do?eid=4-u1.0-B978-0-443-06839-3..00069-2--s0325&isbn=978-0-443-06839-3&sid=1436497207&uniqId=410248674-35#4-u1.0-B978-0-443-06839-3..00069-2--s0325

Mustafa Y, Idris S. The validity of the rapidly diagnostic tests for early detection of urinary tract infection. Düzce Medical Journal 2008;3:39-42.

Devillé WL, Yzermans JC, van Duijn NP, Bezemer PD, van der Windt DA, Bouter LM. The urine dipstick test useful to rule out infections. A meta-analysis of the accuracy. BMC Urol 2004;4:4.

Kacmaz B, Cakir O, Aksoy A, Biri A. Evaluation of rapid urine screening test to detect asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy. Jpn J Infect Dis 2006;59:261-3.

Lammers RL, Gibson S, Kovacs D, Sears W, Strachan G. Comparison of Test Characteristics of Urine Dipstick and Urinalysis at Various Test Cutoff Points. Ann Emerg Med 2001;38:505-12.

Estrada-Altamirano A, Figueroa-Damián R, Villagrana- Zesati R. Infección de vías urinarias en la mujer embarazada. Importancia del escrutinio de bacteriuria asintomática durante la gestación. Perinatol Reprod Hum 2010;24:182-6.

Feitosa DC, da Silva MG, de Lima Parada CM. Accuracy of simple urine tests for diagnosis of urinary tract infections in low-risk pregnant women. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem 2009;17:507-13.

Nicolle L, Bradley S, Colgan R, Rice J, Schaeffer A, Hooton T. Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria in adults. Clin Infect Dis 2005;40:643-54.

Demilie T, Beyene G, Melaku S, Tsegaye W. Urinary bacterial profile and antibiotic susceptibility pattern among pregnant women in North West Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Sci 2012;22:121-8.

Casas RL, Ortiz M, Erazo-Bucheli D. Prevalencia de la resistencia a la ampicilina en gestantes con infección urinaria en el Hospital Universitario San José de Popayán (Colombia) 2007-2008. Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol 2009;60:334-8.

How to Cite

1.
Reyes-Hurtado A, Gómez-Ríos A, Rodríguez-Ortiz JA. Validity of urinalysis and Gram staining in the diagnosis of urinary tract infections in pregnancy. Hospital Simón Bolívar, Bogotá, Colombia, 2009-2010. Rev. colomb. obstet. ginecol. [Internet]. 2013 Mar. 30 [cited 2024 May 17];64(1):53-9. Available from: https://revista.fecolsog.org/index.php/rcog/article/view/130

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2013-03-30

Issue

Section

Original Research
QR Code

Altmetric

Article metrics
Abstract views
Galley vies
PDF Views
HTML views
Other views

Some similar items: