Prenatal diagnosis of placental accretism: findings and role of ultrasound and magnetic resonance. Cases report from university hospital of Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá (Colombia)

Authors

  • Aleida Wilches-Llanos
  • Gloria Palazuelos-Jiménez
  • Stephanie Trujillo-Calderón
  • Javier Romero-Enciso

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18597/rcog.39

Keywords:

Placenta Accreta, Placenta, Ultrasonography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, prenatal diagnosis

Abstract

Objective: To describe and review the relevant findings of the prenatal diagnostic imaging approach in patients placenta accreta diagnosis.

Materials and methods: We present 3 cases of women with risk factors for placenta accreta assessed prenatally at a high-complexity hospital, using ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), with histopathological confirmation of the diagnosis. Clinical and imaging findings are described, together with their histological correlation. A search of the literature was conducted through PubMed, LILACS, and Ebsco, including original papers, topic reviews and case reports on the use and more important aspects of US and MRI in the prenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta.

Results: 11 Original articles, 8 Review articles and 1 case report from our country were included. Placenta accreta is an obstetric pathology that threatens the health of the mother and fetus. Placenta previa associated to placental gaps in US and intraplacental hypointense bands and uterine bulge in MRI are considered as the major signs of accretism. US with color Doppler has 97 % of sensitivity and 92 % of specificity, MRI defines uterine and neighboring organs compromise (s = 77-89.6 %, e = 92 %).

Conclusion: Early prenatal approach through noninvasive diagnostic imaging plays a usefull role providing information about the compromise and extention in patients with risk factors for placental accretism.

Author Biographies

Aleida Wilches-Llanos

Médico Radiólogo. Fellowship Imágenes de la Mujer. Departamento de Radiología e Imágenes Diagnósticas, Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá (Colombia).

Gloria Palazuelos-Jiménez

Médico Radiólogo, Centro de Imágenes de la Mujer. Departamento de Radiología e Imágenes Diagnósticas, Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá (Colombia).

Stephanie Trujillo-Calderón

Médico, asistente de investigación, Departamento de Radiología e Imágenes Diagnósticas, Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá (Colombia).

Javier Romero-Enciso

Médico Radiólogo. Director de Imágenes de la Mujer. Departamento de Radiología e Imágenes Diagnósticas, Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá. Profesor de cátedra, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá (Colombia)

References

Miller DA, Chollet JA, Goodwin TM. Clinical risk factors for placenta previa–placenta accreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177:210-4.

Fox H. Placenta Accreta, 1945-1969. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1972;27:475-90.

Riteau AS, Tassin M, Chambon G, Vaillant C, de Laveaucoupet J, Quéré MP, et al. Accuracy of Ultrasonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Placenta Accreta. PLoS One. 2014;9:e94866.

Palacios Jaraquemada JM, Bruno CH. Magnetic resonance imaging in 300 cases of placenta accreta: surgical correlation of new findings. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005;84:716-24.

Wortman AC, Alexander JM. Placenta Accreta, Increta, and Percreta. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2013;40:137-54.

Fitzpatrick KE, Sellers S, Spark P, Kurinczuk JJ, Brocklehurst P, Knight M. The management and outcomes of placenta accreta, increta, and percreta in the UK: a population-based descriptive study. BJOG. 2014;121:62-70.

Wu S, Kocherginsky M, Hibbard JU. Abnormal placentation: twenty-year analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:1458-61.

Esh-Broder E, Ariel I, Abas-Bashir N, Bdolah Y, Celnikier DH. Placenta accreta is associated with IVF pregnancies: a retrospective chart review. BJOG. 2011;118:1084-9.

Varghese B, Singh N, George RA. Magnetic resonance imaging of placenta accreta. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2013;23:379-85.

Usta IM, Hobeika EM, Musa AA, Gabriel GE. Placenta previa-accreta: risk factors and complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:1045-9.

Warshak CR, Eskander R, Hull AD, Scioscia AL, Mattrey RF, Benirschke K, et al. Accuracy of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of placenta accreta. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:573-81.

Ferreira FE, Angulo M. Predicción del acretismo placentario con ultrasonido Doppler en el Hospital Universitario de Neiva, estudio de cohorte. Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol. 2007;58:290-5.

Comstock CH. Antenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta: a review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;26:89-96.

Derman AY, Haberman S, Zelenko N, Opsha O, Flyer M. MRI of Placenta Accreta: A New Imaging Perspective. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197:1514-21.

Kim JA. Magnetic resonance imaging with true fast imaging with steady-state precession and half- Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo sequences in cases of suspected placenta accreta. Acta radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden: 1987). 2004;45:692-8.

Blaicher W, Brugger PC, Mittermayer C, Schwindt J, Deutinger J, Bernaschek G, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the normal placenta. Eur J Radiol. 2006;57:256-60.

Baughman WC, Corteville JE, Shah RR. Placenta Accreta: Spectrum of US and MR Imaging Findings. RadioGraphics. 2008;28:1905-16.

Twickler DM, Balis AB, Santos R, Martin L, Malone S, et al. Color flow mapping for myometrial invasion in women with a prior cesarean delivery. J Matern Fetal Med. 2000;9:330-5.

Shih JC, Palacios JM, Su YN, Shyu MK, Lin CH, Lin SY, et al. Role of three-dimensional power Doppler in the antenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta: comparison with gray-scale and color Doppler techniques. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33:193-203.

Elhawar y TM, Dabees NL, Youssef MA. Diagnostic value of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in pregnant women at risk for placenta accreta. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013;26:1443-9.

Yang JI, Lim YK, Kim HS, Chang KH, Lee JP, Ryu HS. Sonographic findings of placental lacunae and the prediction of adherent placenta in women with placenta previa totalis and prior Cesarean section. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;28:178-82.

Meng X, Xie L, Song W. Comparing the diagnostic value of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for placenta accreta: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound in medicine & biology. 2013;39:1958-65.

How to Cite

1.
Wilches-Llanos A, Palazuelos-Jiménez G, Trujillo-Calderón S, Romero-Enciso J. Prenatal diagnosis of placental accretism: findings and role of ultrasound and magnetic resonance. Cases report from university hospital of Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá (Colombia). Rev. colomb. obstet. ginecol. [Internet]. 2014 Dec. 15 [cited 2024 May 18];65(4):346-53. Available from: https://revista.fecolsog.org/index.php/rcog/article/view/39

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2014-12-15
QR Code

Altmetric

Article metrics
Abstract views
Galley vies
PDF Views
HTML views
Other views

Some similar items: