The prevalence of ampicillin resistance in pregnant women suffering from urinary tract infections in the San José Teaching Hospital. Popayán, Colombia 2007-2008

Authors

  • Rodolfo L. Casas-P.
  • Manuelita Ortiz
  • Darío Erazo-Bucheli

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18597/rcog.316

Keywords:

urinary infection, pregnancy, ampicillin

Abstract

Introduction: urinary tract infection is the most frequently occurring infectious complication of pregnancy; it affects 20% to 30% of all pregnancies. Its relationship with pre-term childbirth, premature membrane rupture and low birth-weight has been clearly documented and, inspite of the development of new antibiotics, it continues being associated with high maternal and foetal morbidity and mortality. This article tries to determine the prevalence of ampicillin resistance in pregnant women suffering from urinary tract infection, this being especially important if ampicillin continues being the antibiotic of choice for treating this condition.

Methodology: a descriptive prospective study was made in the San José teaching hospital (Popayán) between January 2007 and December 2008. It involved 50 pregnant women having a positive urine culture and ampicillin sensidisc in the antibiogram.

Results: the prevalence of ampicillin resistance was 58%, similar to that stated in previous studies, thereby showing a high microorganism ampicillin resistance rate. No resistance to ceftazidime, ceftriaxone or cefotaxime was found; low resistance to nitrofurantoin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, gentamycin and cephalexin was reported.

Conclusions: using ampicillin as the antibiotic of choice in pregnant women suffering from urinary tract infection is no longer recommended; the resistance rate found (58%) greatly exceeds the maximum limit recommended by experts (20%).

Author Biographies

Rodolfo L. Casas-P.

Médico, Especialista en Ginecología y Obstetricia. Profesor Asociado, Departamento de Ginecología y Obstetricia, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad del Cauca. Popayán (Colombia). 

Manuelita Ortiz

Médico interno. Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad del Cauca. Popayán (Colombia).

Darío Erazo-Bucheli

Médico Interno. Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad del Cauca. Popayán (Colombia).

References

Pino T, Sabina A. Evaluación de la prescripción de la gentamicina en gestantes ingresadas con infección del tracto urinario. Revista Cubana de Obstetricia y Ginecología 2005;31(1). Visitado en 2009 Jun 17. Disponible en: http://www.imbiomed.com.mx/1/1/articulos.php?id_revista=72&id_ejemplar=3371

Agudelo A, Montoya J. Infecciones propias de la mujer. 1a. ed. Cali (Colombia): Editorial Feriva; 2001.

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 91. Treatment of urinary tract infections in non pregnant women. Obstet Gynecol 2008;111:785-94.

Barr JG, Ritchie JW, Henry O, el Sheikh M, el Deeb K. Microaerophilic/anaerobic bacteria as a cause of urinary tract infection in pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1985;92:506-10.

McDowall DR, Buchanan JD, Fairley KF, Gilbert GL. Anaerobic and other fastidious microorganisms in asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant women. J Infect Dis 1981;144:114-22.

Delzell JE Jr, Lefevre ML.Urinary tract infections during pregnancy. Am Fam Physician 2000;61:713-21.

Serrano-Santillán M, Bautista-Samperio L, Arrieta-Pérez T, Jaimes-Valenzuela A. Effectiveness of short treatment amoxicillin and ampicillin in pregnant women with asymptomatic bacteriuria. Arch Med Fam 2005;7:79-86.

Kass EH. Pregnancy, pyelonephritis and prematurity. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1970;13:239-54.

Harris RE, Thomas VL, Shelokov A. Asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy: antibody-coated bacteria, renal function, and intrauterine growth retardation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1976;126:20-5.

Schieve LA, Handler A, Hershow R, Persky V, Davis F. Urinary tract infection during pregnancy: its association with maternal morbidity and perinatal outcome. Am J Public Health 1994;84:405-10.

Pfau A, Sacks TG. Effective prophylaxis for recurrent urinary tract infections during pregnancy. Clin Infect Dis 1992;14:810-4.

Romero R, Oyarzun E, Mazor M, Sirtori M, Hobbins JC, Bracken M. Meta-analysis of the relationship between asymptomatic bacteriuria and preterm delivery/low birth weight. Obstet Gynecol 1989;73:576-82.

Grüneberg RN, Leigh DA, Brumfitt W. Relationship of bacteriuria in pregnancy to acute pyelonephritis, prematurity, and fetal mortality. Lancet 1969;2:1-3.

Gilstrap LC, Leveno KJ, Cunningham FG, Whalley PJ, Roark ML. Renal infection and pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981;141:709-16.

Mead PJ, Harris RE. The incidence of group B beta hemolytic streptococcus in antepartum urinary tract infections. Obstet Gynecol 1978;51:412-4.

Wood EG, Dillon HC Jr. A prospective study of group B streptococcal bacteriuria in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981;140:515-20.

Nicolle LE, Bradley S, Colgan R, Schaeffer A, Hooten TM. Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria in adults. Clin Infect Dis 2005;40:643-54.

Abarzúa F, Zajer C, Donoso B, Belmar C, Riveros JP, González P, et al. Reevaluación de la sensibilidad antimicrobiana de patógenos urinarios en el embarazo. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol 2002;67:226-31.

Ferreira FE, Olaya SX, Zúñiga P, Agudelo M. Infección urinaria durante el embarazo, perfil de resistencia bacteriana al tratamiento en el Hospital General de Neiva (Colombia). Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol 2005;56:239-43.

Angel JL, O'Brien WF, Finan MA, Morales WJ, Lake M, Knuppel RA. Acute pyelonephritis in pregnancy: a prospective study of oral versus intravenous antibiotic therapy. Obstet Gynecol 1990;76:28-32.

Wing DA, Hendershott CM, Debuque L, Millar LK. A randomized trial of three antibiotic regimens for the treatment of pyelonephritis in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1998;92:249-53.

Loughlin KR.Management of urologic problems during pregnancy. Urology 1994;44:159-69.

Ovalle A, Martínez MA, Wolf M, Cona E, Valderrama O,Villablanca E, et al. Estudio prospectivo randomizado comparativo de la eficacia, seguridad y costos de la cefuroxima versus cefradina en pielonefritis aguda en el embarazo. Rev Med Chile 2000;128:749-57.

Nicolle LE. Urinary tract infection: traditional pharmacologic therapies. Am J Med 2002;113:35S-44S.

Gilstrap LC, Ramin SM. Urinary tract infections during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2001;28:581-91.

Barza M, Ioannidis J, Cappelleri JC, Lau J. Single or multiple daily doses of aminoglycosides: a metaanalysis. BMJ 1996;312-338-45.

Sussman O, Saravia J. Estudio comparativo de la eficacia de la dosis única de ofloxacina, amoxacilina y amoxacilina clavulanato. Hospital San Juan de Dios -Santa Fe de Bogotá 1992. Revista CES Medicina 1993;7:179-81.

Vásquez JC, Villar J.Treatment for symptomatic urinary tract infections during pregnancy (Cochrane Review). En: The Cochrane Library, Issue 1. Oxford: Update Software, 2001.

Gilstrap LC, Cunningham FG, Whalley PJ. Acute pyelonephritis in pregnancy: an anterospective study. Obstet Gynecol 1981;57:409-13.

How to Cite

1.
Casas-P. RL, Ortiz M, Erazo-Bucheli D. The prevalence of ampicillin resistance in pregnant women suffering from urinary tract infections in the San José Teaching Hospital. Popayán, Colombia 2007-2008. Rev. colomb. obstet. ginecol. [Internet]. 2009 Dec. 20 [cited 2024 May 11];60(4):334-8. Available from: https://revista.fecolsog.org/index.php/rcog/article/view/316

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2009-12-20

Issue

Section

Original Research
QR Code

Altmetric

Article metrics
Abstract views
Galley vies
PDF Views
HTML views
Other views

Some similar items: