Analytic study of the pregnancy outcome comparing adolescent women and women between 20 to 29 years of age in Bogotá (Colombia)

Authors

  • Jairo Amaya
  • Claudia Borrero
  • Santiago Ucrós

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18597/rcog.527

Keywords:

teenagers, pregnancy, pregnancy outcome, Colombia

Abstract

Objective: to evaluate the possible association of pregnancy in teenagers with an adverse outcome in relation with maternal and newborn morbidity.

Design: cohort population based study.

Population: nullipara women between 10 to 29 years of age, who attended from September 1, 1998 to December 31,1999 to the hospitals of the Bogotá Secretary of Health (n = 8.045).

Methodology: the study was done based in the perinatal data of the Bogotá Secretary of Health. In the cohort analysis, we searched for possible associations between age and each of the studied variables through the calculation of the relative risk (RR). The relative risks and their respective confidence intervals (CI) are reported.

Evaluated outcomes: mode of delivery (cesarean section or vaginal deliver y), premature rupture of fetal membranes, pre-eclampsia, birth weight, prematurity, fetal weight for gestational age, hyaline membrane disease and 5-minute Apgar score.

Results: the c-section rate was less in teenagers (RR 0.85; 95%CI 0.78-0.93) as well as the risk of developing pre-eclampsia (RR 0.65; 95%CI 0.46-0.91); we found no difference between the 2 groups in relation with premature rupture of fetal membranes. We found a significant increase in newborn morbidity in the group of adolescents younger than 15 years of age, as follows: prematurity (RR 1.88; 95%CI 1.14-3.11), small for gestational age (RR 2.09; 95%CI 1.24-3.52) and low birth weight (RR 1.61; 95%CI 1.12-2.32).

Conclusions: in this study we found that the adolescents between 10 to19 years of age, had less probability of c-section deliver y and less risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, in comparison with the group of women from 20 to 29 years of age. The newborns of mothers below 15 years of age had a significant increase in the risk of prematurity, low birth weight, and small for gestational age newborns, in comparison with newborns from mothers from 15 to 29 years of age.

Author Biographies

Jairo Amaya

Ginecoobstetra y epidemiólogo, Hospital Engativá II nivel, Bogotá.

Claudia Borrero

 Ginecoobstetra y epidemióloga, Conceptum.

Santiago Ucrós

Pediatra neumólogo y epidemiólogo, Fundación Santa Fe, Bogotá.

References

Monterrosa A. Causas e implicaciones médico-sociales del embarazo en la adolescencia. Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol 1998;49:225-30.

Unfer V, Piazze Gar nica J, Di Benedetto MR, Castabile L, Gallo G, Anceschi MM. Pregnancy in adolescents. A case-control study. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 1995;22:161-4.

Felice ME, Feinstein RA, Fisher MM, Kaplan DW, Olmedo LF, Rome ES, et al. Adolescent pregnancy--current trends and issues: 1998 American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Adolescence, 1998-1999. Pediatrics 1999;103:516-20.

McAnarney ER, Hendee WR. Adolescent pregnancy and its consequences. JAMA 1989; 262:74-7.

Fraser AM, Brockert JE, Ward RH. Association of young maternal age with adverse reproductive outcomes. N Engl J Med 1995;332:1113-7.

Lao T, Ho LF. Obstetric outcome of teenage pregnancies. Hum Reprod 1998;13:3228-32.

Torres Ramírez A, Coria Soto IL, Zambrana MM, Lara Ricalde R. La resolución obstétrica de las adolescentes en comparación con la de las adultas. Ginecol Obstet Mex 1999;67:377-84.

Ambadekar NN, Khandait DW, Zodpey SP, Kasturwar NB, Vasudeo ND. Teenage pregnancy outcome: a record based study. Indian J Med Sci 1999;53:14-7.

Wang CS, Chou P. Characteristics and outcomes of adolescent pregnancies in Kaohsinng County, Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc 1999;98:415-21.

Berenson AB, Wiemann CM, McCombs SL. Adverse perinatal outcomes in young adolescents. J Reprod Med 1997;42:559-64.

Hampton HL, Powell RH. Obstetrical outcome in the very young adolescent. J Miss State Med Assoc 1999;40:411-4.

Morris DL, Berenson AB, Lawson J, Wiemann CM. Comparison of adolescent pregnancy outcomes by prenatal care source. J Reprod Med 1993;38:375-80.

Bozkaya H, Mocan H, Usluca H. Beser E, Gumustekin D. A retrospective analysis of adolescent pregnancies. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1996;42:146-50

Escobar A, Balcázar N. Factores de Riesgo y características de la gestación en la adolescente y su hijo. Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol 1995;46:109-16.

Amini SB, Catalano PM, Dierker LJ, Mann LI. Births to teenagers: trends and obstetric outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 1996;87:668-74.

Ewko EE, Moawad A. Maternal age and preterm births in a black population. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2000;14:145-51.

Buitendijk SE, van Enk A, Oosterhout R, Ru M. Obstetrical outcome in teenage pregnancies in the Netherlands. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1994;137:2536-40.

Orvos H, Nyirati I, Hadju J, Pal A, Nyari T, Kovacs L. Is adolescence pregnancy associates with adverse perinatal outcome? J Perinat Med 1999;27:199-203.

Verma V, Das KB. Teenage primigravidae: a comparative study. Indian J Public Health 1997;41:52-5.

Carles G, Jacquelin X, Raynal P, Bertsch M, Zaccarato AM. Pregnancy and childbirth in adolescents under 16. Study of 150 cases in French Guyana. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 1998;27:508-13.

Kumbi S, Isehak A. Obstetric outcome of teenage pregnancy in northwestern Ethiopia. East Afr Med J 1999;76:138-40.

Thame M, Wilks R, Matadial L, Forrester TE. A comparative study of pregnancy outcome in teenage girls and mature women. West Indian Med J 1999;48:69-72.

Rauh VA, Andrews HF. Birth outcomes for Asian-American adolescents: a high-risk group? J Am Womens Assoc 1999;54:121-5.

Reichman NE, Pagnini DL. Maternal age and birth outcomes: data from New Jersey. Fam Plann Perspect 1997;29:268-72.

Conolly G, Kennelly S, Conroy R, Byme P. Teenage pregnancy in the Rotunda Hospital. Ir Med J 1998;91:209-12.

Konje JC, Palmer A, Watson A, Hay DM, Imrie A, Ewings P. Early teenage pregnancies in Hull. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992;99:969-73.

Barda G, Arbel-Alon S, Bernstein D, Zakut H, Menczer J. Pregnancy and delivery in a group of Israeli teenagers. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 1998;25:32-5.

Bolzan A, Guimarey L, Norry M. [Relationship between the nutritional status of pregnant adolescents and fetal growth]. Medicina (B Aires) 1999;59:254-8.

Lao TT, Ho LF. Relationship between preterm delivery and maternal height in teen age pregnancies. Hum Reprod 2000;15:463-8.

Maso MJ, Gong EJ, Jacobson MS, Bross DS, Heald FP. Anthropometric predictors of low birth weight outcome in teenage pregnancy. J Adoles Healt Care 1988;9:188-93.

Ravindra C. Correlation between adolescent nutrition during pregnancy and outcome of low birth-weight babies. J Fla Med Assoc 1989;76:523-5.

McIntire DD, Bloom SL, Casey BM, Leveno KJ. Birth weight in relation to morbidity and mortality among newborn infants. N Engl J Med 1999;340:1234-8.

Lao TT, Ho LF. The obstetric implication of teenage pregnancy. Hum Reprod 1997;12:2303-5.

How to Cite

1.
Amaya J, Borrero C, Ucrós S. Analytic study of the pregnancy outcome comparing adolescent women and women between 20 to 29 years of age in Bogotá (Colombia). Rev. colomb. obstet. ginecol. [Internet]. 2005 Sep. 9 [cited 2024 Jul. 22];56(3):216-24. Available from: https://revista.fecolsog.org/index.php/rcog/article/view/527

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2005-09-09

Issue

Section

Original Research
QR Code

Altmetric

Article metrics
Abstract views
Galley vies
PDF Views
HTML views
Other views

Some similar items: