Using prenatal ultrasound for detecting congenital anomalies in 12.760 newborn babies from 20042005 in 3 hospitals in Bogotá, Colombia

Authors

  • Juan Camilo Gómez-Ruiz
  • Nicolás Fernández
  • Paola Páez
  • Ignacio Manuel Zarante

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18597/rcog.451

Keywords:

congenital abnormality, ultrasonography, prenatal diagnosis, congenital malformation, ECLAMC

Abstract

Objective using ultrasound as diagnostic method for determining the frequency of pre-natally diagnosed congenital abnormalities.

Methods: a study of cases and controls using Latin-American Collaborative Study of Congenital Malformations (ECLAMC) methodology. All newborn children from 3 hospitals in Bogotá were assessed during 2004 and 2005.

Results: 12.760 newborn were reported. 382 of the newborns had congenital abnormalities (2.99%); however, only complete information was obtained for 287 of the cases (75.13%). An average of 3,47 sonographic evaluations were made for the cases and 3.19 for the controls (p<0.05). The cases had lower gestational age (37.59 cf 38.29 weeks) (p<0.01), lower birth weight (2,841.9 cf3,022.67 grs) (p<0.01) and height (48.3 cm cf 49.34) (p<0.01) than the control group. 151 congenital abnormalities were diagnosed using obstetric ultrasound (52.6%); however, just 49 of them (32.5%) were detected using this tool.

Conclusions: ultrasound detection rate in the 3 hospitals was lower compared to data from other studies. There is thus a need for better quality and technology to improve major congenital abnormality detection rates.

Author Biographies

Juan Camilo Gómez-Ruiz

 Médico interno, Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga.

Nicolás Fernández

Médico servicio social obligatorio modalidad investigación, Instituto de Genética Humana, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. Bogotá, Colombia.

Paola Páez

Residente III año Genética Médica, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. Bogotá, Colombia.

Ignacio Manuel Zarante

Profesor Asociado, Instituto de Genética Humana, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. Bogotá, Colombia.

References

D´Alton ME, DeCherney AH. Prenatal diagnosis. N Engl J Med 1993;328:114-20.

McAuliffe FM, Fong KW, Toi A, Chitayat D, Keating S, Johnson JA. Ultrasound detection of fetal anomalies in conjunction with first-trimester nuchal translucency screening: A feasibility study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;193:1260-5.

Souza AP, Pilalis A, Kavalakis I, Antsaklis P, Papantoniou N, Mesogitis S, et al. Screening for major structural abnormalities at the 11 to 14 week ultrasound scan. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;194:393-6.

Fleischer AC, Romero R, Manning FA, Jeanty P, James ER Jr, eds. The principles and practice of ultrasonography in obstetrics and gynecology. Chapter 13. 4th ed. Appleton & Lange; 1991. p. 205.

O´Leary P, Breheny N, Dickinson JE, Bower C, Goldblatt J, Hewitt B, et al. First-trimester combined screening for Down syndrome and other fetal anomalies. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107:869-76.

Castilla EE, Orioli LM. ECLAMC: the Latin-American Collaborative study of congenital malformations. Community Genet 2004;7:76-94.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Improved national prevalence estimates for 18 selected major birth defects-United States 1999-2001. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2006;54:1301-5.

Nazer J, Aravena T, Cifuentes L. Malformaciones congénitas en Chile. Un problema emergente (período 1995-1999). Rev Med Chile 2001;129:895-904.

Nelson KB, Ellenberg JH. Predictors of low and very low birth weight and the relation of these to cerebral palsy. JAMA 1985;254:1473-9.

Garmel SH, D´Alton ME. Diagnostic ultrasound in pregnancy: an overview. Semin Perinatol 1994;18:117-32.

Johns N, Al-Salti W, Cox P, Kilby MD. A comparative study of prenatal ultrasound findings and post-mortem examination in a tertiary referral center. Prenat Diagn 2004;24:339-46.

Garne E, Loane H, Dolk H, De Vigan C, Scarano G, Tucker D. Prenatal diagnosis of severe structural congenital malformations in Europe. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005;25:6-11.

Nikkila A, Rydhstroem H, Kallen B, Jorgensen C. Ultrasounds screening for fetal anomalies in southern Sweden: A population-based study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2006;85:688-93.

Kalish RB, Chasen ST, Rosenzweig L, Chervenak FA. Esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula: impact of prenatal suspicion on neonatal outcome in a tertiary care center. J Perinat Med 2003;31:111-4.

Bar-On E, Mashiach R, Inbar O, Weigl D, Katz K, Meizner I. Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of club foot: outcome and recommendations for counseling and follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005;87:990-3.

Anderson N, Luehr B, Ng R. Normal obstetric ultrasound reduces the risk of Down syndrome in fetuses of older mothers. Australas Radiol 2006;50:429-34.

Cicero S, Avgidou K, Rembouskos G, Kagan KO, Nicolaides KH. Nasal bone in first-trimester screening for trisomy 21. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;195:109-14.

Papp C, Beke A, Band Z, Szigeti Z, Toth-Pal E, Papp Z. Prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 13: analysis of 28 cases. J Ultrasound Med 2006;25:429-35.

Carvalho MH, Brizot ML, Lopes LM, Chiba CH, Miyadahira S, Zugaib M. Detection of fetal structural abnormalities at the 11-14 week ultrasound scan. Prenat Diagn 2002;22:1-4.

Borruto F, Comparetto C, Acanfora L, Bertini G, Rubaltelli FF. Role of ultrasound evaluation of nuchal translucency in prenatal diagnosis. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2002;29:235-41.

How to Cite

1.
Gómez-Ruiz JC, Fernández N, Páez P, Zarante IM. Using prenatal ultrasound for detecting congenital anomalies in 12.760 newborn babies from 20042005 in 3 hospitals in Bogotá, Colombia. Rev. colomb. obstet. ginecol. [Internet]. 2007 Sep. 30 [cited 2024 May 19];58(3):194-201. Available from: https://revista.fecolsog.org/index.php/rcog/article/view/451

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2007-09-30

Issue

Section

Original Research
QR Code

Altmetric

Article metrics
Abstract views
Galley vies
PDF Views
HTML views
Other views

Some similar items: