Assessing a diagnostic test: basic concepts in a study with naturalistic sampling

Authors

  • Miguel Ángel Castro-Jiménez
  • Daladier Cabrera-Rodríguez
  • María Isabel Castro-Jiménez

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18597/rcog.496

Keywords:

biomedical technology assessment, sensitivity and specificity, predictive value of test, validity of tests

Abstract

Diagnostic test evaluation studies represent a scientific design helping to determine the validity and reliability of the procedures which can be used in clinical practice by doctors and other health professionals. This article deals with medical training in epidemiology. Its objectives are summarizing concepts used when evaluating a new diagnostic test and explaining how to calculate and interpret the measurements used making a design with naturalistic sampling, emphasizing the meaning of test sensitivity, specificity and predictive value.

Author Biographies

Miguel Ángel Castro-Jiménez

Magíster en Epidemiología. Departamento de Salud Pública, Centro de Investigaciones Epidemiológicas, Facultad de Salud, Universidad Industrial de Santander. Bucaramanga, Colombia 

Daladier Cabrera-Rodríguez

Coordinador Médico Salud Social IPS S.A.

María Isabel Castro-Jiménez

Fisioterapeuta. Bucaramanga, Colombia.

References

Kraemer HC. Evaluating medical tests. Objective and quantitative guidelines. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1992.

Orozco LC, Camargo DM. Evaluación de tecnologías diagnósticas y tipos de muestreo. Biomédica 1997;17:321-4.

Hays RD, Anderson RT, Revicky D. Assessing reliability and validity of measurement in clinical trials. En: Staquet MJ, Hays RD, Fayers PM. Quality of life assessment in clinical trials: methods and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998. p. 169-82.

Staquet M, Rozencweig M, Lee YJ, Muggia FM. Methodology for the assessment of new dichotomous diagnostic tests. J Chronic Dis 1981;34:599-610.

Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurements scales: a practice guide to their development and use. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications; 1995.

Singh N, Mishra AK, Shukla MM, Chand SK, Barthi PK. Diagnostic and prognostic utility of an inexpensive rapid on site malaria diagnostic test (ParaHIT f) among ethnic tribal population in areas of high, low and no transmission in central India. BMC Infect Dis 2005;5:50.

Tier ney MC, Yao C, Kiss A, McDowell I. Neuropsychological tests accurately predict incident Alzheimer disease after 5 and 10 years. Neurology 2005;64:1853-9.

Beck JR, Shultz EK. The use of relative operating characteristic (ROC) curves in test performance evaluation. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1986;110:13-20.

How to Cite

1.
Castro-Jiménez M Ángel, Cabrera-Rodríguez D, Castro-Jiménez MI. Assessing a diagnostic test: basic concepts in a study with naturalistic sampling. Rev. colomb. obstet. ginecol. [Internet]. 2007 Mar. 30 [cited 2024 May 17];58(1):45-52. Available from: https://revista.fecolsog.org/index.php/rcog/article/view/496

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2007-03-30

Issue

Section

Medical Education
QR Code

Altmetric

Article metrics
Abstract views
Galley vies
PDF Views
HTML views
Other views

Some similar items: