Safety of pelvic mass extraction through colpotomy in women taken to laparoscopic gynaecologic interventions at Hospital de San José de Bogotá, Colombia, 2016

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18597/rcog.3058

Keywords:

Morcellation, uterine myomectomy, laparoscopy, colpotomy, natural orifice endoscopic surgery

Abstract

Objective: To describe the safety of colpotomy in terms of intra- and post-operative complications in women taken to laparoscopy for the removal of benign masses.

Materials and methods: Case series of patients with benign adnexal or uterine masses taken to laparoscopic surgery and removal of the specimen through colpotomy. The patients signed the informed consent. Patients with obliterated posterior cul-de-sac, narrow vagina, absence or uterus, deep endometriosis, inflammatory pelvic disease, masses of less than 4 cm, were excluded. Consecutive sampling was used. Sociodemographic, clinical, qualitative and quantitative variables were studied by means of a descriptive analysis of the data. The research study was endorsed by the ethics committee of the institution.

Results: During the study period, 12 procedures for the removal of benign pelvic masses using posterior colpotomy were performed. Mean age was 34.3 years (IQR: 29-39,5). Of these cases, 50% were nulliparous women. Mean surgical time was 127 minutes (IQR: 90-150). There were no conversions to laparotomy, and there were no intra- or postoperative complications.

Conclusions: Posterior colpotomy is an option that can be considered in the removal of benign pelvic masses of more than 5 cm in size.

Author Biographies

Rodrigo Ernesto Rodríguez-Ruiz

Instructor asociado, Departamento de Ginecología y Obstetricia, Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud (FUCS), Hospital de San José, Bogotá.

Ángel David Miranda-Cruz

Instructor asociado, Departamento de Ginecología y Obstetricia, Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud (FUCS), Hospital de San José, Bogotá.

Cesar Augusto Rendon-Becerra

Residente de Cirugía Endoscópica Ginecológica, Departamento de Ginecología y Obstetricia, Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud (FUCS), Hospital de San José, Bogotá. ceaure123@hotmail.com

Catalina Agudelo-Restrepo

Especialista en Cirugía Endoscópica Ginecológica, Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud (FUCS), Hospital de San José, Bogotá.

References

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins—Gynecology. Practice Bulletin No. 174: Evaluation and management of adnexal masses. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128:e210-26. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000001768

Medeiros LR, Stein AT, Fachel J, Garry R, Furness S. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for benign ovarian tumor: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2008;18:387-99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1438.2007.01045.x

Medeiros LRF, Rosa DD, Bozzetti MC, Fachel JMG, Furness S, Garry R, et al. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for benign ovarian tumour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(2):CD004751.

Miller CE. Methods of tissue extraction in advanced laparoscopy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2001;13: 399-405.

Uccella S, Cromi A, Bogani G, Casarin J, Serati M, Ghezzi F. Transvaginal specimen extraction at laparoscopy without concomitant hysterectomy: Our experience and systematic review of the literature. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013;20:583-90.

Ghezzi F, Cromi A, Uccella S, Bogani G, Serati M, Bolis P. Transumbilical versus transvaginal retrieval of surgical specimens at laparoscopy: A randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207:112.e1-6.

Chou L-Y, Sheu B-C, Chang D-Y, Huang S-C, Chen S-Y, Hsu W-C, et al. Comparison between transumbilical and transabdominal ports for the laparoscopic retrieval of benign adnexal masses: A randomized trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;153:198-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.07.029

Wong LFA, Anglim B, Wahab NA, Gleeson N. A review of the open laparoscopic Hasson technique and retrieval of adnexal specimen via umbilicus. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;37:487-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2016.1269226

Ghezzi F, Raio L, Mueller MD, Gyr T, Buttarelli M, Franchi M. Vaginal extraction of pelvic masses following operative laparoscopy. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:1691-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-002-9043-z

Clark LE, Menderes G, Tower AM, Silasi DA, Azodi M. A Simple approach to specimen retrieval via posterior colpotomy incision. JSLS. 2015;19(2). https://doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2014.00222.

Linke GR, Luz S, Janczak J, Zerz A, Schmied BM, Siercks I, et al. Evaluation of sexual function in sexually active women 1 year after transvaginal notes: A prospective cohort study of 106 patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2013;398:139-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-012-0993-x.

Dubuisson JB, Chapron C. Uterine fibroids: Place and modalities of laparoscopic treatment. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1996;65:91-4.

Goldfarb HA, Fanarjian NJ. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal myomectomy: A case report and literature review. JSLS. 2001;5:81-5.

Duggal BS, Tarneja P, Sharma RK, Rath SK, Wadhwa RD. Laparoscopic management of adnexal masses. Med J Armed Forces India. 2004;60:28-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-1237(04)80153-9

Ou C-S, Harper A, Liu YH, Rowbotham R. Laparoscopic myomectomy technique. Use of colpotomy and the harmonic scalpel. J Reprod Med. 2002;47:849-53.

Committee on Gynecologic Practice. Committee Opinion No 701: Choosing the route of hysterectomy for benign disease. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129:e155-9.https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002112

How to Cite

1.
Rodríguez-Ruiz RE, Miranda-Cruz Ángel D, Rendon-Becerra CA, Agudelo-Restrepo C. Safety of pelvic mass extraction through colpotomy in women taken to laparoscopic gynaecologic interventions at Hospital de San José de Bogotá, Colombia, 2016. Rev. colomb. obstet. ginecol. [Internet]. 2018 Sep. 28 [cited 2024 May 17];69(3):189-96. Available from: https://revista.fecolsog.org/index.php/rcog/article/view/3058

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2018-09-28

Issue

Section

Original Research
QR Code

Altmetric

Article metrics
Abstract views
Galley vies
PDF Views
HTML views
Other views
Crossref Cited-by logo

Some similar items: