Electricity in Endosurgery

Authors

  • Jaime Saavedra S.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18597/rcog.690

Keywords:

Endosurgery, electricity, alternating current, cut, coagulation, fulguration, monopolar, bipolar

Abstract

Although electrosurgery has been with us for decades, few surgeons received formal training in the nature of electricity and how the physical laws governing electricity affected its potential clinical application.

The erroneous belief that electrosurgery techniques increase scar formation or impair healing processes led surgeons to adopt other, more expensive energy sources.

A more thorough understanding of electrosurgical principles, coupled with modern electric equipment, with understandable readouts, superior methods of grounding, and finer instruments with improved shielding should lead to a wider and more informed use of electrosurgery.

Author Biography

Jaime Saavedra S.

Profesor titular Departamento de Ginecología y Ostetricia Universidad del Valle, Cali- Colombia. Jefe del servicio de medicina reproductiva Hospital Universitario de Valle. Presidente Sociedad Colombiana de Endoscopia. Director general Centro de Biomedicina Reproductiva-Fecundar Cali, Valle del Cauca.

References

Cushing H, Bovie W: Electrosurgery as an aid to the removal of intracranial tumors. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1928; 47: 751-784.

Clark W. Oscillatory dessication in the treatment of accessible malignant growths and minor surgical conditions. J Adv Thr. 1911; 29: 169-174.

Kelly HA, Ward G: Electrosurgery. WB Saunders, Philadelphia. 1931.

Stepphen MC. Operative Laparoscopy and Hysteroscopy. Electrosurgery 1996; 37-86.

Hulka JF, Rich H. Texbook of Laparoscopy. Power: Electricity and Laser. 1994; 24-50.

Hausner K. Electrosurgery-macro vs micro. In Laser vs. Electrosurgery: Practical Considerations for Gynecology. Addisson. IL, Elmed Inc., 1989; 7-9.

Oringer MJ, Kelly WJ, Harrinson JD. Laboratory experimental evaluation of efficacy of clinical electrosurgical techniques in electrosurgery in density, Philadelphia. 1975, W.B Saunders.

Filmar S, Jetha N, McComb P, Gomel V. A comparative histologic study on the healing process after tissue transection: I. Carbon dioxide laser and electrosurgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 160: 1062-1067.

Boesh PF. Laparoscopie. Schweiz Zkrankenh. 1936; 6: 62-67.

Levy BS, Soderstron RM, Dail DH. Bowel injuries during laparoscopy: gross anatomy and histology. J Reprod Med. 1985; 309: 168-170.

Reich H, Vancaille TH, Soderstrom RM. Electrical techniques. In: Martin DC, Holtz GL., Levinson CL, Soderstrom RM, eds. Manual of Endoscopy. Santa Fe Springs. American Association of Gynecology Laparoscopists, 1990; 105-112.

Soderstrom RN, Levy BS, Engel T. Reducing bipolar sterilization failures. Obstet Gynecol. 1989; 74: 60-64.

Gomel V, James C. Intraoperative management of uretral injury during operative laparoscopy. Fertil Steril 1991; 55: 416-419.

Grainger RA, Soderstron RM, Schiff SF, et al. Uretral injuries at laparoscopy: insights into diagnosis, management and prevention. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 75: 839-843.

Corson SL. Electrical considerations of laparoscopic sterilization. J. Reprod Med 1973; 11: 159-164.

How to Cite

1.
Saavedra S. J. Electricity in Endosurgery. Rev. colomb. obstet. ginecol. [Internet]. 2000 Jun. 30 [cited 2024 May 18];51(2):95-103. Available from: https://revista.fecolsog.org/index.php/rcog/article/view/690

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2000-06-30

Issue

Section

Topic Review
QR Code

Altmetric

Article metrics
Abstract views
Galley vies
PDF Views
HTML views
Other views
Crossref Cited-by logo