Decrease of cesarean section rate at Fundación Clínica Valle del Lili

Authors

  • Edgar Cobo C.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18597/rcog.665

Keywords:

Medically unnecessary cesarean, rates, decrease

Abstract

In recent years a large number of medically unnecessary cesarean sections have being performed all over the country. At the Fundación Clínica Valle del Lili, a private medical center in Cali, Colombia, a c-section rate of 66.2% was registered during the first 2 years of operation (1994-95), which increased to 67.8% in 1997-98. In 1998-99, attempts to lower these extremely high rates were addressed. Three strategies were implemented to achieve this goal: a) to allow patients from the national health system to get access to our service, b) to delegate the management of labor and delivery to female general practitioners, and c) to have a weekly group discussion of all c-sections performed by the staff. As a result, c-section rate decreased to 30.0% (27.1% for the patients coming from the national system and 57% for private patients) A significant reduction was observed in the 4 more frequent indications: previous c-section, dystocia, fetal distress and breech presentation. C-sections performed at patient's request showed a rate of 0.9%, all of them coming from the private patients. The importance of these findings is discussed.

Author Biography

Edgar Cobo C.

Profesor Emérito de Obstetricia y Ginecología. Fundación Clínica Valle del Lili.

References

Cobo E. Tasas de operación cesárea en la Fundación Clínica Valle del Lili: ¿Es posible reducirlas? Colombia Med 1998; 29: 53-61.

Bottoms SF, Rosen MG, Sokol RJ. The increase in the cesarean birth rate. N Eng J Med 1980; 302: 559-63.

Brown MC. An audit on caesarean section rates in a maternity district. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1983; 90: 283-84.

Myers SA, Gleicher NA. A successful program to reduce cesarean section rate. N Eng J Med 1988; 319: 1115-17.

Francome C, Savage W. Caesarean section in Britain and the United States. 12% or 24%: is either the right rate? Soc Sci Med 1993; 37: 1199-218.

Lidegaard O, Jensen LM, Weber T. Technology use, cesarean section rates and perinatal mortality at Danish maternity wards. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1994; 73: 204-5.

Nielsen TF, Olavson PO, Ingemarsson I. The cesarean section in Sweden: the end of the rise. Birth 1994; 21: 34-8.

Sánchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM, Peterson HB, Martinez-Schnell B, Thompson RJ. Reducing cesarean section rate at a teaching hospital. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163: 1081-88.

Easterbrook PhJ, Berlin JA, Gapalan R, Matthews DR. Publication bias in clinical research. Lancet 1991; 337: 867-72.

CLASP: a randomized trial of low dose aspirin for the prevention and treatment of preclampsia among 9.364 pregnant women. (CLASP: Collaborative Low dose Aspirin Study in Pregnancy) Collaborative Group. Lancet; 343: 619-29.

Cobo E, Conde-Agudelo A, Delgado J, Canabal H, Congote A. Cervical cerclage: an alternative for the rnanagement of placenta previa? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 179: 122-5.

Lagrew DD, Morgan MA. Decreasing the cesarean section rate in a private hospital: Success without mandated clinical changes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 174: 184-91.

Studnicki J, Remmel R, Campbell R, Wernwer DC. The impact of legislative imposed practice guidelines on cesarean section rates: The Florida experience. Am J Med Qual 1997; 12: 62-8.

Kline J, Arias F. Analysis of factors determining the selection of repeated cesarean section or trial of labor in patients with histories of prior cesarean delivery. J Reprod Med 1993; 382: 8992.

O'Driscoll K, Jackson RJA, Galleher JT. Active management of labor and cephalopelvic disproportion. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonwealth 1970; 77: 385-9.

O'Driscoll K, Foley M, MacDonald D. Active rnanagement of labor as an alternative to cesarean section for dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 1984; 63: 485-90.

Thurnan GR, Hales KA, Morgan MA. Evaluation of the fetal-pelvic relationship. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1992; 35: 570-81.

Ferguson J, Newberry Y, Turkheirner E, De Angelis G, Finnerty Y, Agawal S. The fetal-pelvic index does not predict fetal-pelvic disproportion. Soc Perinat Obstetricians. Annual Meeting. Miami, USA. Feb 4-7, 1998.

Porreco RP, Meir FR. Trial of labor in patients with multiple cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983; 28: 770-2.

Flamm BL, Newman LA, Thomas SJ, Falcon D, Yoshida MM. Vaginal births after cesarean section delivery. Results of a 5- year multicentre collaborative study. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 76: 750-5.

Asakura H, Myers SA. More than one previous cesarean delivery. A 5-year experience with 435 patients. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 85: 924-9.

Odeh M, Tarazova L, Wolfsorn M, Oettinger M. Evidence that women with a history of cesarean section can deliver twins safely. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1997; 76: 663-6.

Parer JT, Livingstone EG. What is fetal distress? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 1421-7.

Zuspan FP, Quilligan EJ, Iams JD, van Geijn HP. Predictors of intraparturn fetal distress: the role of electronic fetal monitoring. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979; 135: 287-91.

Chevernak F, McCullough. An ethically justified algorithm for offering, recommending, and performing cesarean delivery and its application to manage care practice. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 87: 302-5.

Kolderup LB, Laros RK Jr, Musci TJ. Incidence of persistent birth injury in macrosomic infants: association with of delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 37-41.

Gregory KD, Henry OA, Ramicone E, Chan LS, Platt LD. Maternal and infant complications in high and normal weight infants by method of delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 179: 507-13.

Van Alten D, Eskes M, Treffers PE. Midwifery in the Netherlands. The Wormerveer study, selection, mode of delivery and infant morbidity. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989; 96: 656-62.

Rockenschaub A. Technology free obstetrics at the Semmelweiss Clinic. Lancet 1990; 335: 977.

Levy B, Wilkinson R, Marine w. Reducing neo natal mortality rate with nurse midwives. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1971; 109: 50-58.

International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics and the International Conference of Midwives. Maternity Care in the World, 1976, 2nd edition. FIGO/ICM.

Barrington E. Midwifery in Canada. Toronto: New Canada Publications. 1985.

Blondel B, Pusch D, Schmidt E. Some characteristics of antenatal care in 13 European countries. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1985; 92: 565-8.

Raisler J. Improving pregnancy outcome with nurse-midwifery care. J Nurse Midwifery 1985; 30: 189-91.

Blanchette H. Comparison of obstetric outcome of a primary-care access clinic staffed by certified nurse-midwives and a private practice group of obstetricians in the same community. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172: 1864-71.

Hall MJ. Commentary: confidential enquires into maternal death. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 97: 752-3.

Lifford RJ, van Coeverden de Groot HA, Moore PJ and Bingman P. The relative risk of cesarean secttion (antepartum and elective) and vaginal delivery: a detailed analysis to exclude the effects of medical disorders and other acute pre-existing physiological disturbances. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 97: 883-93.

Department of Health, Welsh Office Scottish Home and Health Dept. Department of Health and Social Sciences Northern Ireland Report on Confidential Inquiries into maternal deaths in the United Kingdom 1985-87. Her Majesty 's Stationery Office. London 1991.

Schuitmaker N, van Roosmalen J, Decker G, van Dongen P, van Geijn H, Gravenhorst JB. Maternal mortality after cesarean section in the Netherlands. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1996; 87: 302-5.

Belitzky R. El nacimiento por cesárea hoy. Salud Perinatal. Boletín del Centro Latinoamericano de Perinatología y Desarrollo Humano (CLAP) 1989; 3: 101.

How to Cite

1.
Cobo C. E. Decrease of cesarean section rate at Fundación Clínica Valle del Lili. Rev. colomb. obstet. ginecol. [Internet]. 2000 Dec. 29 [cited 2024 Jul. 22];51(4):241-8. Available from: https://revista.fecolsog.org/index.php/rcog/article/view/665

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2000-12-29

Issue

Section

Original Research
QR Code

Altmetric

Article metrics
Abstract views
Galley vies
PDF Views
HTML views
Other views
Crossref Cited-by logo