Pyramids in medical education: Their conceptualization and utility summarized
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18597/rcog.3994Keywords:
Medical education, teaching, learning, evaluation, curriculumAbstract
Objectives: To examine the conceptual underpinnings of learning pyramids, their limitations and some proposed modifications, and to describe their utility.
Materials and methods: Starting with a selection of pyramids based on whether graphic design was part of their original design and on their conceptual description, we examined the criticisms they have received and the modifications derived from those observations, and the use given to the pyramids most commonly used in medical education.
Results: Five pyramids were included, namely, George Miller, Edgar Dale, Donald Kirkpatrick, Benjamín Bloom and Abraham Maslow. Pyramids describe different aspects of medical education evaluation, either of individuals or of training programs, including competencies, identity, reliability, learning, behavior, results, cognitive complexity and self-realization.
Conclusions: As theoretical models, the pyramids examined have contributed to support learning processes in health professions. Their practical utility extends to different specialties and education levels given that they can help faculty optimize curricular design, teaching and evaluation processes. It is important to conduct a local assessment of the effects on health science programs built on these theoretical models.
Author Biographies
Luis Carlos Domínguez-Torres, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía (Colombia).
Departamento de Cirugía, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía (Colombia).
Neil Valentín Vega-Peña, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía (Colombia).
Departamento de Cirugía, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía (Colombia).
References
Dzara K, Gooding H. A guide to educational pyramids commonly used in medical education programs. Acad Med. 2022;97(2):313. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003816
Hale AJ, Ricotta DN, Freed J, Smith CC, Huang GC. Adapting Maslow’s hierarchy of needs as a framework for resident wellness. Teach Learn Med. 2019;31(1):109-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2018.1456928
Goel S, Angeli F, Dhirar N, Singla N, Ruwaard D. What motivates medical students to select medical studies: A systematic literature review. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1123-4
Masters K. Edgar Dale’s Pyramid of Learning in medical education: A literature review. Med Teach. 2013;35(11). https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2013.800636
Miller GE. The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad Med. 1990;65(9):S63-S67. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199009000-00045
Cruess RL, Cruess SR, Steinert Y. Amending Miller’s Pyramid to include professional identity formation. Acad Med. 2016;91(2):180-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000913
Cate OT, Carraccio C, Damodaran A, Gofton W, Hamstra S, Hart D, et al. Entrustment decision making: Extending Miller’s Pyramid. Acad Med. 2021;96(2):199-204. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003800
López MJ, Melo de Andrade MV, Domínguez LC, Durán VD, Durante E, Francischetti I, et al. Conceptual foundations of Entrustable professional activities for health professional education in Latin America. Educ Medica. 2022;23(1):100714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edumed.2022.100714
Kirkpatrick DL. The four levels of evaluation. In: Evaluating Corporate Training: Models and Issues. Springer, Dordrecht; 1998. Pp. 95-112. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4850-4_5
Porter RD, Schick IC. Revisiting Bloom’s taxonomy for ethics and other educational domains [Internet]. J Health Adm Educ. 2003;20(3):167-88. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14527101/
Phillips AW, Smith SG, Straus CM. Driving deeper learning by assessment. An Adaptation of the Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy for Medical Imaging in Gross Anatomy. Acad Radiol. 2013;20(6):784-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2013.02.001
van der Vleuten CPM, Driessen EW. What would happen to education if we take education evidence seriously? Perspect Med Educ. 2014;3(3):222-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40037-014-0129-9
Dreyfus SE. The five-stage model of adult skill acquisition. Bull Sci Technol Soc. 2004;24(3):177-81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467604264992
Bandura A. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company; 1997.
Norcini JJ, Blank LL, Arnold GK, Kimball HR. The mini-CEX (clinical evaluation exercise): A preliminary investigation. Ann Intern Med. 1995;123(10):795-9. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-123-10-199511150-00008
Schuwirth LWT, van der Vleuten CPM. Programmatic assessment: From assessment of learning to assessment for learning. Med Teach. 2011;33(6):478-85. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2011.565828
Frank JR, Snell LS, Cate OT, Holmboe ES, Carraccio C, Swing RC, et al. Competency-based medical education: Theory to practice. Med Teach. 2010;32(8):638-45. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2010.501190
Al-Eraky M, Marei H. A fresh look at Miller’s pyramid: Assessment at the ‘Is’ and ‘Do’ levels. Med Educ. 2016;50(12):1253-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13101
Lave J, Wenger E. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation (Learning in Doing: Social, Cognitive and Computational Perspectives). UK: Cambridge University Press; 1991. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355
Masters K. Edgar Dale’s Pyramid of Learning in medical education: Further expansion of the myth. Med Educ. 2020;54(1):22-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13813
Zhang Q, Li M, Wang X, Ofori E. Dr. Edgar Dale. TechTrends. 2019;63(3):240-2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00395-1
Dale E. Waste in Education. Superv Q. 1969;4(2):18-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878736909490632
Frye AW, Hemmer PA. Program evaluation models and related theories: AMEE Guide No. 67. Med Teach. 2012;34(5). https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.668637
Adams J, Neville S. Program evaluation for health professionals: What it is, what it isn’t and how to do it. Int J Qual Methods. 2020;19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920964345
Stufflebeam DL. Foundational Models for 21st Century Program Evaluation. In: Evaluation Models; 2005. Pp. 33-83. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47559-6_3
Kirkpatrick D, Kirkpatrick J. Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers; 2006.
Praslova L. Adaptation of Kirkpatrick’s four level model of training criteria to assessment of learning outcomes and program evaluation in Higher Education. Educ Assessment, Eval Account. 2010;22(3):215-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-010-9098-7
Lee GSJ, Chin YH, Jiang AA, Nistala KRY, Iyer SG, Lee SS, et al. Teaching medical research to medical students: A systematic review. Med Sci Educ. 2021;31(2):945-62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-020-01183-w
Choy CL, Liaw SY, Goh EL, See KC, Chua WL. Impact of sepsis education for healthcare professionals and students on learning and patient outcomes: A systematic review. J Hosp Infect. 2022;122:84-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2022.01.004
Leslie K, Baker L, Egan-Lee E, Esdaile M, Reeves S. Advancing faculty development in medical education: A systematic review. Acad Med. 2013;88(7):1038-45. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e318294fd29
Khanduja PK, Bould MD, Naik VN, Hladkowicz E, Boet S. The role of simulation in continuing medical education for acute care physicians: A systematic review. Crit Care Med. 2015;43(1):186-93. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000000672
Hill AG, Yu TC, Barrow M, Hattie J. A systematic review of resident-as-teacher programmes. Med Educ. 2009;43(12):1129-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03523.x
Gordon M, Patricio M, Horne L, Muston A, Alston SR, Pammi M, et al. Developments in medical education in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: A rapid BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 63. Med Teach. 2020;42(11):1202-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1807484
Eisner EW. Benjamin Bloom. Prospects. 2000;30(3):387-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02754061
Bloom B. Taxonomy of educational objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. New York: David McKay Company; 1956.
Anderson L, Krathwohl D. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (Longman, ed.). New York; 2001.
Krathwohl DR. A revision of bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory Pract. 2002;41(4):212-8. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
Domínguez LC, Mora CM, Restrepo JA. “Learning to Learn” in the extended inverted classroom: An evaluation of the effects of interactive teaching on knowledge and cognitive regulation in medical students. Rev Colomb Psiquiatr. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcp.2021.07.007
Maslow A. A Theory of Human Motivation. US: Martino Fine Books; 2013.
Connell Pavelka L. Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. Encycl Child Behav Dev. 2011:913-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79061-9_1720
Allsop S, McKinley RK, Douglass C, Pope L, Macdougall C. Every doctor an educator? Med Teach. 2023:1-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2022.2158069
How to Cite
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Funding data
| Article metrics | |
|---|---|
| Abstract views | |
| Galley vies | |
| PDF Views | |
| HTML views | |
| Other views | |
