Consensus on thromboprophylaxis in gynecological surgery

Authors

  • Grupo Desarrollador del Consenso de Tromboprofilaxis en Cirugía Ginecológica.
  • Federación Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecología (FECOLSOG)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18597/rcog.3666

Abstract

Objective: To draw a synthesis of the available evidence regarding interventions for the prevention of venous thromboembolic events during the perioperative care of women with benign gynecological pathology, with the aim of reducing the associated morbidity and mortality. Materials and methods: The development group included healthcare professionals, decision-makers and one patient representative. All the participants stated their disclosures. Answerable clinical questions were built and outcomes were graded. The search for information was conducted in Medline, Embase, Epistemonikos and LILACS, but it also included grey literature and was updated on September 22, 2020, with no date or language restrictions. The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach was used to determine the quality of the evidence and the strength of the recommendations. Formal consensus was developed in accordance with the RAND/UCLA methodology. The document was submitted to peer review before publication. Results: The abbreviated version of the “consensus on the prevention of venous thromboembolic events during the perioperative care of women with benign gynecological pathology” is presented together with the supporting evidence and respective recommendations. Conclusions: The key recommendations for implementation include the use of the Caprini scale and of interventions consistent with the individual perioperative risk level.

References

Cantrell LA, Garcia C, Maitland HS. Thrombosis and thromboprophylaxis in gynecology surgery. Clin Obstet

Gynecol. 2018;61(2):269-77. https://doi.org/10.1097/GRF.0000000000000355

Rogers SOJ, Kilaru RK, Hosokawa P, Henderson WG, Zinner MJ, Khuri SF. Multivariable predictors of postoperative venous thromboembolic events after general and vascular surgery: Results from the patient safety in surgery study. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204(6):1211-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.02.072

Heit JA, Spencer FA, White RH. The epidemiology of venous thromboembolism. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2016;41(1):3-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-015-1311-6

van Korlaar IM, Vossen CY, Rosendaal FR, Bovill EG, Cushman M, Naud S, et al. The impact of venous thrombosis on quality of life. Thromb Res. 2004;114(1):11-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2004.04.007

Anderson DR, Morgano GP, Bennett C, Dentali F, Francis CW, Garcia DA, et al. American Society of Hematology 2019. Guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: Prevention of venous thromboembolism in surgical hospitalized patients. Blood Adv. 2019;3(23):3898-944. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000975

Dong K, Song Y, Li X, Ding J, Gao Z, Lu D, et al. Pentasaccharides for the prevention of venous thromboembolism. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;10(10):CD005134. https://doi.org//10.1002/14651858.CD005134.pub3

Cabrera-Rayo A, Hernández-Díaz EJ, Guzmán-Rosales G, Laguna-Hernández G, Pliego-Reyes C, Zendejas-Villanueva JL, et al. Tromboprofilaxis en pacientes médicos y quirúrgicos: resultados de un estudio multicéntrico realizado en hospitales de la Ciudad de México. Med Int Méx. 2017;33(6):746-53. https://doi.org/10.24245/mim.v33i6.1461

Ministerio de la Protección Social - Colombia, Centro de Estudios e Investigación en Salud de la Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá. Guía metodológica para la elaboración de Guías de Práctica Clínica con Evaluación Económica en el Sistema General de Seguridad Social en Salud Colombiano; 2013. Disponible en: http://gpc.minsalud.gov.co/recursos/Documentos%20compartidos/Guia_Metodologica_Web.pdf

Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Directriz para el fortalecimiento de los programas nacionales de guías informadas por la evidencia. Una herramienta para la adaptación e implementación de guías en las Américas. Washington, D.C.: OPS; 2018. Disponible en: http://iris.paho.org/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/49145/9789275320167_spa.pdf?sequence=5&isAllowed=y;

Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Atkins D, Brozek J, Vist G, et al. GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):395-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.012

Higgins JPT, Green S, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons, 2011.

Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, Thuku M, Hamel C, Moran J, et al. AMSTAR 2: A critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or nonrandomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ. 2017;358:j4008. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j4008

Higgins JPT, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Sterne JAC. Assessing risk of bias in a randomized trial. In: Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ WV, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.1 (updated September 2020). Cochrane, 2020. Disponible en: www.training.cochrane.org/handbook.

Whiting PF, Rutjes AWS, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB, et al. QUADAS-2: A revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(8):529-36. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009

GRADEpro GDT: GRADEpro Guideline Development Tool [Software]. McMaster University, 2015 (developed by Evidence Prime, Inc.). Disponible en: https://gradepro.org/

Vallejo-Ortega MT, Sánchez-Pedraza R, Feliciano-Alfonso JE, García-Pérez MJ, Gutiérrez-Sepúlveda MP, Merchán-Chaverra RA. Manual Metodológico para la elaboración de protocolos clínicos en el Instituto Nacional de Cancerología. Bogotá: Instituto Nacional de Cancerología; 2016.

Bahl V, Hu HM, Henke PK, Wakefield TW, Campbell DAJ, Caprini JA. A validation study of a retrospective venous thromboembolism risk scoring method. Ann Surg. 2010;251(2):344-50. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b7fca6

Gould MK, Garcia DA, Wren SM, Karanicolas PJ, Arcelus JI, Heit JA, et al. Prevention of VTE in nonorthopedic surgical patients: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2012;141(2 Suppl):e227S-e277S. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.11-2297

He ML, Xiao ZM, Lei M, Li TS, Wu H, Liao J. Continuous passive motion for preventing venous thromboembolism after total knee arthroplasty. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(7):CD008207. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008207.pub3

Sachdeva A, Dalton M, Lees T. Graduated compression stockings for prevention of deep vein thrombosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; 11(11):CD001484. https://doi.org//10.1002/14651858.CD001484.pub4

Sajid MS, Desai M, Morris RW, Hamilton G. Knee length versus thigh length graduated compression stockings for prevention of deep vein thrombosis in postoperative surgical patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 (5):CD007162. https://doi.org//10.1002/14651858.CD007162.pub2

Feng JP, Xiong YT, Fan ZQ, Yan LJ, Wang JY, Gu ZJ. Efficacy of intermittent pneumatic compression for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients undergoing gynecologic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget. 2017;8(12):20371-79. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007162.pub2

Hajibandeh S, Hajibandeh S, Antoniou GA, Scurr JR, Torella F. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for the prevention of venous thromboembolism. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;11(11):CD011764. https://doi.org//10.1002/14651858.CD011764.pub2

Oates-Whitehead RM, D’Angelo A, Mol B. Anticoagulant and aspirin prophylaxis for preventing thromboembolism after major gynaecological surgery. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2003;(4):CD003679.

Junqueira DR, Zorzela LM, Perini E. Unfractionated heparin versus low molecular weight heparins for avoiding heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in postoperative patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;4(4):CD007557. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007557.pub3

Felder S, Rasmussen MS, King R, Sklow B, Kwaan M, Madoff R, et al. Prolonged thromboprophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin for abdominal or pelvic surgery. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2019;8:CD004318. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004318.pub5

Rausa E, Kelly ME, Asti E, Aiolfi A, Bonitta G, Winter DC, et al. Extended versus conventional thromboprophylaxis after major abdominal and pelvic surgery: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Surgery. 2018;164(6):1234-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2018.05.028

Milinis K, Shalhoub J, Coupland AP, Salciccioli JD, Thapar A, Davies AH. The effectiveness of graduated compression stockings for prevention of venous thromboembolism in orthopedic and abdominal surger y patients requiring extended pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2018;6(6):766-777.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2018.05.020

Kakkos SK, Caprini JA, Geroulakos G, Nicolaides AN, Stansby G, Reddy DJ, et al. Combined intermittent pneumatic leg compression and pharmacological prophylaxis for prevention of venous thromboembolism. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2016;9(9):CD005258. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005258.pub3

Sang C-Q, Zhao N, Zhang J, Wang S-Z, Guo S-L, Li S-H, et al. Different combination strategies for prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in patients: A prospective multicenter randomized controlled study. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):8277. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25274-2

How to Cite

1.
de Tromboprofilaxis en Cirugía Ginecológica. GD del C, de Obstetricia y Ginecología (FECOLSOG) FC. Consensus on thromboprophylaxis in gynecological surgery. Rev. colomb. obstet. ginecol. [Internet]. 2021 Mar. 30 [cited 2024 May 17];72(1):53-68. Available from: https://revista.fecolsog.org/index.php/rcog/article/view/3666

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2021-03-30

Issue

Section

Review Article
QR Code

Altmetric

Article metrics
Abstract views
Galley vies
PDF Views
HTML views
Other views