Orthotopic uterus transplantation. Sheep model experiment, Cali (Colombia)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18597/rcog.3504

Abstract

Objective: It has been recommended that professionals who are planning to perform uterine transplantation should first carry out animal experiments. This paper describes the procedure for uterine transplant in sheep, as well as short and medium- term results. Materials and methods: Experimental surgery study in sheep subjected to uterine explantation and transplant. Four 40-50 kg sheep received uteri transplantation (orthotopic) from four live donors. End-to-side vascular anastomosis was used, the vagina was sutured on one plane and the uterus was fixed to the pelvic wall. Complications and 180-day evolution are described. Results: Transplant surgery was accomplished in the 4 sheep. Surgical time in the first procedure was 240 minutes, while the last procedure lasted 185 minutes. Warm ischemia time was reduced from 42 to 22 minutes. One sheep died on the seventh postoperative day due to an intraoperative complication unrelated to the vascular anastomosis. A second sheep developed local vaginal infection treated with metronidazole and evolved satisfactorily. No transplant rejection had occurred in the remaining 3 sheep after 6 months. Conclusions: The ovine model allowed surgical training in experimental uterine transplant surgery. For the authors, it offered an opportunity to gain knowledge and make progress towards future uterus transplantation in women with absolute uterine factor infertility in Colombia.

Author Biographies

Felipe Castro-Villegas, Centro Médico Imbanaco, Cali (Colombia).

Médico cirujano, especialista en trasplante hepático, Centro Médico Imbanaco, Cali (Colombia).

Gustavo Adolfo Canaval-Erazo, Centro Médico Imbanaco, Cali (Colombia).

Médico ginecobstetra, Centro Médico Imbanaco, Cali (Colombia).

Juan Manuel Rico-Juri, Centro Médico Imbanaco, Cali (Colombia).

Médico cirujano, especialista en trasplante hepático, Centro Médico Imbanaco, Cali (Colombia).

José Óscar Gutiérrez-Montes, Universidad del Valle, Cali (Colombia).

Profesor de Farmacología y Medicina Regenerativa, Escuela de Medicina, Facultad de Salud, Universidad del Valle, Cali (Colombia).

Anabel Vanin-Aguas, Centro Médico Imbanaco, Cali (Colombia).

Médico cirujano, especialista en trasplante hepático, Centro Médico Imbanaco, Cali (Colombia).

Hoover Orlando Canaval-Erazo, Centro Médico Imbanaco, Cali (Colombia).

Médico ginecobstetra, Centro Médico Imbanaco, Cali (Colombia). Profesor del Departamento de Ginecología y Obstetricia, Escuela de Medicina, Facultad de Salud, Universidad del Valle, Cali (Colombia).

References

World Health Organization – Human Reproduction Programme. Sexual and reproductive health. Infertility definitions and terminology. WHO-HRP; 2016. Disponible en: https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/topics/infertility/definitions/en/

Ministerio de Salud / Profamilia. Encuesta Nacional de Demografía y Salud. Colombia. 2015. Disponible en: https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR334/FR334.pdf

Mascarenhas MN, Flaxman SR, Boerma T, Vanderpoel S, Stevens GA. National, regional, and global trends in infertility prevalence since 1990: A systematic analysis of 277 health surveys. PLoS Med. 2012;9(12):e1001356. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001356

Taylor E, Gomel V. The uterus and fertility. Fertil Steril. 2008;89(1):1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.09.069

Acién P. Incidence of Müllerian defects in fertile and infertile women. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(7):1372-6. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019588

Monteiro CS, Cavallo IK, Dias JA, Pereira FAN, Reis FM. Uterine alterations in women undergoing routine hysteroscopy before in vitro fertilization: High prevalence of unsuspected lesions. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2019;23(4):396-401. https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20190046

Raga F, Bauset C, Remohi J, Bonilla-Musoles F, Simon C, Pellicer A. Reproductive impact of congenital Mullerian anomalies. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(10):2277-81. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/12.10.2277

American Fertility Society. Classification of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, mullerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril. 1988;49(6):944-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59942-7

Johannesson L, Dahm-Kähler P, Eklind S, Brännström M. The future of human uterus transplantation. Womens Health. 2014;10(4):455-67. https://doi.org/10.2217/WHE.14.22

Corte Constitucional, Sentencia T-226/10 de 23 de marzo de 2010. Magistrado Ponente: Mauricio González Cuervo. Disponible en: http://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/RELATORIA/2010/T-226-10.htm

Beetar Bechara B. La maternidad subrogada en Colombia: hacia un marco jurídico integral e incluyente. Estud Soc. 2019;21(2). https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/sociojuridicos/a.6869

Fageeh W, Raffa H, Jabbad H, Marzouki A. Transplantation of the human uterus. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002;76(3):245-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7292(01)00597-5

Brännström M, Johannesson L, Bokström H, Kvarnström N, Mölne J, Dahm-Kähler P, et al. Livebirth after uterus transplantation. Lancet. 2015;385:607-16.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61728-1

Ejzenberg D, Mendes LR, Haddad LB, Baracat EC, D’Albuquerque LA, Andraus W. Uterine transplantation: A systematic review. Clinics (São Paulo). 2016;71(11): 679-83. https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2016(11)10

O’Donovan L, Williams NJ, Wilkinson S. Ethical and policy issues raised by uterus transplants. Br Med Bull. 2019;131(1):19-28. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldz022

Milliez J. Uterine transplantation FIGO Committee for the ethical aspects of human reproduction and women’s health. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;106(3):270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.03.045.

Eraslan S, Hamernik RJ, Hardy JD. Replantation of uterus and ovaries in dogs, with successful pregnancy. Arch Surg. 1966;92(1):9-12. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1966.01320190011002

Tzakis AG. Nonhuman primates as models for transplantation of the uterus. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(1):61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.03.004

Andraus W, Ejzenberg D, Santos RM, et al. Sheep model for uterine transplantation: The best option before starting a human program. Clinics (São Paulo). 2017;72(3):178-82. https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2017(03)08

Dahm-Kähler P, Wranning C, Lundmark C, et al. Transplantation of the uterus in sheep: Methodology and early reperfusion events. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2008;34(5):784-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0756.2008.00854.x

Wranning CA, Marcickiewicz J, Enskog A, Dahm-Kähler P, Hanafy A, Brännström M. Fertility after autologous ovine uterine-tubal-ovarian transplantation by vascular anastomosis to the external iliac vessels. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(8):1973-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deq130

Brännström M, Wranning CA, Altchek A. Experimental uterus transplantation. Hum Reprod Update. 2010;16(3):329-45. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmp049

Martin LJ, Carey KD, Comuzzie AG. Variation in menstrual cycle length and cessation of menstruation in captive raised baboons. Mech Ageing Dev. 2003;124(8-9),865-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-6374(03)00134-9

How to Cite

1.
Castro-Villegas F, Canaval-Erazo GA, Rico-Juri JM, Gutiérrez-Montes J Óscar, Vanin-Aguas A, Canaval-Erazo HO. Orthotopic uterus transplantation. Sheep model experiment, Cali (Colombia). Rev. colomb. obstet. ginecol. [Internet]. 2020 Sep. 7 [cited 2024 May 18];71(3):265-74. Available from: https://revista.fecolsog.org/index.php/rcog/article/view/3504

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2020-09-07

Issue

Section

Original Research

Funding data

QR Code

Altmetric

Article metrics
Abstract views
Galley vies
PDF Views
HTML views
Other views
Crossref Cited-by logo