Conservative management in a patient with cervical ectopic pregnancy in Nariño, Colombia: Case report and review of the literature

Authors

  • Henry Hernán Bolaños-Bravo Hospital Universitario Departamental de Nariño
  • Andrés Ricaurte-Fajardo Pontificia Universidad Javeriana http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7374-4460
  • Fabio Zarama-Márquez Hospital Universitario Departamental de Nariño http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9722-7153
  • Andrés Ricaurte-Sossa Hospital Universitario Departamental de Nariño https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0429-0490
  • Ruth Fajardo-Rivera Hospital Universitario Departamental de Nariño
  • Ruben Chicaiza-Maya Hospital Universitario Departamental de Nariño
  • Carlos Andrés Guerrero-Mejía Hospital Universitario Departamental de Nariño

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18597/rcog.3357

Keywords:

Ectopic pregnancy, conservative treatment, curettage, chorionic gonadotropin, fertility

Abstract

Objectives: To report a case of cervical pregnancy (CP) treated successfully with a conservative approach, and to conduct a review of the literature regarding conservative medical and surgical treatment.

Materials and methods: Patient with cervical pregnancy treated pharmacologically with methotrexate (MTX) followed by dilation and curettage, with a satisfactory clinical course. A search of articles was conducted in Medline via PubMed, LILACS, SciElo and Google Scholar using the terms “cervical ectopic pregnancy,” “conservative treatment,” “curettage,» “methotrexate,” “uterine artery embolization,” “hysteroscopy.” Reports and case series were selected of patients with cervical pregnancy diagnosed on ultrasound at any gestational age, subjected to conservative medical or surgical treatment.

Results: A total of 22 studies were included; 95 patients with CP treated with MTX were identified, 93 of them successfully treated. The most frequent complication was bleeding in 12%; 26% required complementary surgical treatment. Increasingly, uterine artery embolization (UAE) is carried out preventatively (7 cases) before curettage or treatment with MTX. The hysteroscopy is another recent alternative (20 cases). Abdominal hysterectomy was required in two cases, one of which was a cervico-isthmic pregnancy.

Conclusions: Treatment with MTX continues to be the most frequent strategy. Dilation and curettage with endocervical plugging may be an option to consider in the emergency management of EP in primary care institutions. In institutions equipped with high complexity technology, uterine artery embolization before the surgical procedure and histeroscopy are options to be considered. Considering that early diagnosis of EP is now possible, multi-center studies comparing different management options are needed for better assessment of their safety and effectiveness.

Author Biographies

Henry Hernán Bolaños-Bravo, Hospital Universitario Departamental de Nariño

Especialista en Ginecología y Obstetricia, Departamento de Ginecología y Obstetricia, Hospital Universitario Departamental de Nariño, San Juan de Pasto (Colombia).

Andrés Ricaurte-Fajardo, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana

Médico Interno, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio. Pontifica Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá D.C (Colombia).

Fabio Zarama-Márquez, Hospital Universitario Departamental de Nariño

Especialista en Ginecología y Obstetricia, Departamento de Ginecología y Obstetricia, Hospital Universitario Departamental de Nariño, San Juan de Pasto (Colombia).

Andrés Ricaurte-Sossa, Hospital Universitario Departamental de Nariño

Especialista en Ginecología y Obstetricia, Departamento de Ginecología y Obstetricia, Hospital Universitario Departamental de Nariño, San Juan de Pasto (Colombia).

Ruth Fajardo-Rivera, Hospital Universitario Departamental de Nariño

Médico interno, Hospital Universitario Departamental de Nariño, Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia, San Juan de Pasto (Colombia).

Ruben Chicaiza-Maya, Hospital Universitario Departamental de Nariño

Médico interno, Hospital Universitario Departamental de Nariño, Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia, San Juan de Pasto (Colombia).

Carlos Andrés Guerrero-Mejía, Hospital Universitario Departamental de Nariño

Médico interno, Hospital Universitario Departamental de Nariño, Fundación Universitaria San Martín, San Juan de Pasto (Colombia).

References

Alkatout I, Honemeyer U, Strauss A, et al. Clinical diagnosis and treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2013;68:571-81.

https://doi.org/10.1097OGX.0b013e31829cdbeb

Schneider P, Drezin DH. Cervical pregnancy. Am J Obstet & Gynecol. 1957;93: 27-40.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(57)90735-3

Hung TH, Jeng CJ, Yang YC, Wang KG, Lan CC. Treatment of cervical pregnancy with methotrexate. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1996;53(3):243-7.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7292(96)02653-7

Ushakov FB, Elchalal U, Aceman PJ, Schenker JG. Cervical pregnancy: Past and future. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1997;52:45-59.

https://doi.org/10.1097/00006254-199701000-00023

Vela G, Tulandi T. Cer vical pregnancy: The importance of early diagnosis and treatment. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007;14:481-4.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2006.11.012

Cunningham FG, Grant NF, Leveno KJ, Gilstrap LC III, Haut JC, Wenstrom KD, editors. Williams Obstetrics. 21st ed. McGraw Hill: New York; 1997. pp. 883-910.

Samal SK, Rathod S. Cer vical ectopic pregnancy. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2015;6(1):257-60.

https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-9668.149221

Rock JA, Damario MA. Ectopic pregnancy. In: Rock JA, Jones HW III, editors. The Linde’s operative gynaecology. 9th ed. USA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2003. pp. 507-536.

Hosni MM, Herath RP, Mumtaz R. Diagnostic and therapeutic dilemmas of cervical ectopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2014;69(5):261-76.

https://doi.org/10.1097/OGX.0000000000000062

Takashima M, Yamasaki M, Fujita I, et al. Enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in monitoring of conser vative treatment of cer vical pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995;21(6):545-50.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0756.1995.tb00910.x

Shinagawa S, Nagayama M. Cervical pregnancy as a possible sequela of induced abortion. Report of 19 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1969;105:282-4.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(69)90075-1

Oyer R, Tarakjian D, Lev-Toaff A, et al. Treatment of cervical pregnancy with methotrexate. Obstet Gynecol. 1988;71:469-71.

Ash S, Farrell SA. Hysteroscopic resection of a cervical ectopic pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 1996;66(5):842-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)58649-X

Murji A, Garbodian K, Thomas J, Cruickshank B. Conservative management of cervical ectopic pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015;37:1016-20.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1701-2163(16)30051-2

Kung FT, Chang SY. Efficacy of methotrexate treatment in viable and nonviable cervical pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;181:1438-44.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70389-3

Mangino FP, Romano F, Di Lorenzo G, Buomono F, De santo D, Scrimin F, et al. Total hysteroscopic treatment of cervical pregnancy: The 2-step technique. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019;26(6):1011-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2019.01.009

Hung TH, Shau WY, Hsieh TT, Hsu JJ, Soong YK, Jeng CJ. Prognostic factors for an unsatisfactory primary methotrexate treatment of cervical pregnancy: A quantitative review. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(9):2636-42. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.9.2636

Mesogitis S, Pilalis A, Daskalakis G, et al. Management of early viable cer vical pregnancy. BJOG. 2005;112:409-11.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00447.x

Scutiero G, Nappi L, Matteo M, Balzano S, Macarini L, Greco P. Cervical pregnancy treated by uterine artery embolization combined with office hysteroscopy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013; 166(1):104-6.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.10.013

Kung FT, Lin H, Hsu TY, et al. Differential diagnosis of suspected cervical pregnancy and conservative treatment with the combination of laparoscopy-assisted uterine artery ligation and hysteroscopic endocervical resection. Fertil Steril. 2004;81:1642-9.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.11.034

Kirk E, Condous G, Haider Z, et al. The conservative management of cervical ectopic pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;27:430-7.

https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.2693

Uludag SZ, Kutuk MS, Aygen EM, Sahin Y. Conservative management of cervical ectopic pregnancy: Single-center experience. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2017;42:1-6.

https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.13362

Verma U, Goharkhay N. Conser vative management of cer vical ectopic pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:671-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.12.054

Hu J, Tao X, Yin L, Shi Y. Successful conservative treatment of cervical pregnancy with uterine artery embolization followed by curettage: a report of 19 cases. BJOG. 2016; 123 Suppl 3:97-102.

https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14005

Taylor JE, Yalcinkaya TM, Akar ME. Successful conservative management of cervical ectopic pregnancy: a case

series. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011;283(6):1215-7.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1529-7

Tanos V, ElAkhras S, Kaya B. Hysteroscopic management of cervical pregnancy: Case series and review of the literature. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2019;48(4):247-53.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2018.05.001

Kim JS, Nam KH, Kim TH, Lee HH, Lee KH. Hysteroscopic management of cervical pregnancy with intrauterine irrigation with H2O2. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15:627-30.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2008.06.006

Martínez RA, Quintero L, García CA, Fernández de Castro A. Embarazo ectópico cervical: diagnóstico preciso y enfoque de manejo médico. Reporte de caso. Univ Med. 2018;59(1):75-86.

https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.umed59-1.ecto

De la Loza Cava, LR, Arévalo JAM. Embarazo ectópico cervical. Cuando el tratamiento conservador falla. Reporte de un caso y revisión de la bibliografía. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2012;80(10):668-72.

Figueroa J, Castillo HF, Gonzales SD, Vivas MR, Hurtado SM, et al. Embarazo ectópico istmico-cervical complicado con placenta increta: reporte de caso. Avan Biomed. 2012;1(2):82-6.

Weibel HS, Alserri A, Reinhold C, Tulandi T. Multidose methotrexate treatment of cervical pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2012;34:359-62.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1701-2163(16)35217-3

Martinez Camilo RV, Perez Martínez MP, Torriente Hernandez B. Embarazo ectópico cervical tratado con metotrexate. Reporte de un caso. Rev Cubana Obstet Ginecol. 2000;26:87-90.

Tejero EL, Ortega S, Royo B, Andrés P, Lapresta M, Campillos JM. Gestación ectópica cervical tratada mediante punción ecoguiada intrasacular de metrotexato. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol. 2010;75(5):325-8.

https://doi.org/10.4067/S071775262010000500009

De La Vega GA, Avery C, Nemiroff R, Marchiano D. Treatment of early cervical pregnancy with cerclage, carboprost, curettage, and balloon tamponade. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(2 Pt2):505-7.

https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000220599.74326.94

Samal S, Ghose S, Pallavee P, Porkkodi P. Successful management of live cervical ectopic pregnancy: A case report. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(12):QD03-QD04).

https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2015/12230.6871

How to Cite

1.
Bolaños-Bravo HH, Ricaurte-Fajardo A, Zarama-Márquez F, Ricaurte-Sossa A, Fajardo-Rivera R, Chicaiza-Maya R, et al. Conservative management in a patient with cervical ectopic pregnancy in Nariño, Colombia: Case report and review of the literature. Rev. colomb. obstet. ginecol. [Internet]. 2019 Dec. 30 [cited 2024 May 18];70(4):282-97. Available from: https://revista.fecolsog.org/index.php/rcog/article/view/3357

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2019-12-30
QR Code

Altmetric

Article metrics
Abstract views
Galley vies
PDF Views
HTML views
Other views