A cohort study of vaginal birth following prior cesarean section in the San Juan de Dios hospital, Cali, Colombia

Authors

  • Olga Lucía Cuero-vidal
  • Carlos Andrés Clavijo-Prado

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18597/rcog.231

Keywords:

prior cesarean section, vaginal birth, predictor factor

Abstract

Objective: determining the incidence of vaginal birth following a prior cesarean section and evaluating the predictive ability of the vaginal birth predictor score on the admission scoring system described by Flamm in 1997.

Materials and methods: this was a retrospective cohort study of women having undergone a prior cesarean section and then a pregnancy lasting at least 37 weeks who had consulted at the San Juan de Dios hospital in Cali (HSJD) between May 30th 2007 and May30th 2008. The vaginal birth rate was calculated and sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) were evaluated, as were positive (RVP) and negative verisimilitude ratios (RVN) regarding vaginal birth predictor score following a cesarean when their scores were 4 or more and 8 or more.

Results: there were 20.3% vaginal births in this group; 36% of the pregnant women having scores between 4 and 7 had undergone vaginal birth and 83% of the expectant mothers scoring 8 or more. A ≥4 points cut-off point gave 85.7% sensitivity, 69.1% specificity, 41.3% Positive Predictive Value (PPV) and 95% Negative Predictive Value (NPV) and 2.8 Positive likelihood ratio P LR(+) and 0.2 Negative likelihood ratio (NLR). If cut-off point were ≥8, then this gave 83.3% sensitivity, 82.6% specificity, 17.9% PPV, 99.1% NPV, 4.8 RVP and 0.2 RVN.

Conclusion: vaginal birth frequency following a cesarean section was 20%. Pregnant women having scores less than 4 had a low probability of having a vaginal birth.

Author Biographies

Olga Lucía Cuero-vidal

Médica de la Universidad del Valle, especialista en Ginecología y Obstetricia de la Universidad de Antioquia, candidata al título de Magíster en Epidemiología de la Universidad del Valle. Ginecóloga Obstetra del Hospital San Juan de Dios y Docente de la Facultad de Medicina de la Universidad Santiago de Cali. Cali (Colombia).

Carlos Andrés Clavijo-Prado

Médico de la Universidad Santiago de Cali, Médico de SALUDCOOP– EPS, Médico Asistencial en la Unidad de Cuidado Coronario, Corporación Universitaria Comfenalco, Universidad Libre. Cali (Colombia).

References

Tasas de cesáreas: análisis de los estimados regionales y nacionales. Rev Panam Salud Pública 2007;21:251.

World Health Organization. Programmes and projects. Making pregnancy safer. Country profiles on maternal and new born health. Visitado 2011 May 19. Disponible en: http://www.who.int/making_pregnancy_safer/countries/en/index.html

Casale RA. Niveles socioeconómicos y tasa de cesárea en Argentina. ¿Una inequidad en el acceso a la salud? Estudio ecológico. Revista de Obstetricia y Ginecología de Buenos Aires 2009;88:200-1

Echais F. Cesarea. Experiencia en el Hospital de Oxampampa. Ginecol obstet 2004;50:106-10.

Avanza MJ, Sosa TR, Giusti SA, Alegre C, Benitez A, Rivero MI. Frecuencia e indicaciones de cesárea en la población adolescente de un centro hospitalario. Revista Médica del Nordeste 2004;5:2-16.

Cobo E. Tasa de cesárea Fundación Clínica Valle del Lili. ¿Es posible reducirla? Colomb Med 1998;29:53-61.

Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Easterling TR, Martin DP. Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2001;345:3-8.

Ricci P, Perucca E, Altamirano A. Nacimiento por parto vaginal después de una cesárea. Prueba de trabajo de parto versus cesárea electiva a repetición. Rotura uterina, una complicación posible. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol 2003;68:523-8.

Rosen MG; Dickinson JC; Westhoff CL. Vaginal birth after cesarean: a meta-analysis of morbidity and mortality. Obstet Gynecol 1991;77:465-70.

Mozurkewich EL, Hutton EK. Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: a meta-analysis of the literature from 1989 to 1999. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183:1187-97.

Diaz H, Cusati R, Carrillo H et al. Parto insturmental en cesarea anterior: importancia del inter valo inteparto. Rev Obstet Ginecol Venez 2007;67:79-86.

Ortiz Lee C, de Marcos López N. ¿Estamos preparados para enfrentar el parto vaginal posterior a cesárea? Rev Cubana Obstet Ginecol 1998;24:65-8.

Ortiz Lee C, de Marcos López N. Parto vaginal pos cesarea. Primeros casos en Cuba. Rev Cubana Obstet Ginecol 1998:24:117-21.

ACOG Practice Bulletin Clinical management Guidelines for Obstetrician-Gynecologists. Vaginal Birth After Previous Cesarean Delivery. Number 54; 2004.

Guise JM, Berlin M, McDonagh M, Osteweil P, Chan B, Helfand M. Safety of vaginal birth after cesarean: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:420-9.

Eden KB, Hashima JN, Osterweil P, Nygren P, Guise JM. Childbirth preferences after cesarean birth: a review of the evidence. Birth 2004;31:49-60.

Landon MB, Hauth JZ, Leveno KJ, Spong Cy, Leindecker S, et al. Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes Associated with a Trial of Labor after Cesarean Delivery. N Engl J Med 2004.352:2581-9.

Romero A, Arce R, Lind S, Bazan C. Prueba de trabajo de parto en pacientes con antecedente de cesárea previa. Revista de Posgrado de VIa Cátedra de Medicina 2004:12-6.

Sánchez R, Ortiz HI, Chávez A. Parto vaginal en pacientes con antecedente de cesárea previa. Rev Fac Med UNAM 2003;46:28-31.

Mizunoya F, Nakata M, Kondo T, yamashita S, Inoue S. Management of vaginal birth after cesarean. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2002;28:240-4.

Vergara Reina R, Acosta Pérez M. Experiencias en el parto vaginal poscesárea en un hospital haitiano. Rev Cubana Obstet Ginecol 2003;29(1).

Grinstead J, Grobman W. Induction of labor after one prior cesarean: Predictors of vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:534-8.

Rodríguez E, Escudero A, Gaite M, Suárez M.T. Vía del parto tras cesárea anterior: factores asociados. Prog Obstet Ginecol 2003;46:250-6.

Hashima JN, Eden KB, Osterweil P, Nygren P, Guise JM. Predicting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: A review of prognostic factors and screening tools. Am J Obste and Gynecol 2004;190:547-55.

Guise JM, Eden K, Emeis C, Denman MA, Marshall N, Fu RR, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights. Evid Rep Technol Asses (Full Rep) 2007;2010:1-397.

Cecatti JG, Pires HM, Faúndes A, Duarte Osis MJ. Factors associated with vaginal birth after previous cesarean section in Brazilian women. Rev Panam Salud Pública 2005;18:107-13.

Ebell MH. Predicting the likelihood of successful vagina birth after cesarean delivery. Am Fam Physician 2007;76:1192-4.

Flamm BL, Geiger AM. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: an admission scoring system. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90:907-10.

How to Cite

1.
Cuero-vidal OL, Clavijo-Prado CA. A cohort study of vaginal birth following prior cesarean section in the San Juan de Dios hospital, Cali, Colombia. Rev. colomb. obstet. ginecol. [Internet]. 2011 Jun. 30 [cited 2024 May 11];62(2):148-54. Available from: https://revista.fecolsog.org/index.php/rcog/article/view/231

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2011-06-30

Issue

Section

Original Research
QR Code

Altmetric

Article metrics
Abstract views
Galley vies
PDF Views
HTML views
Other views
Crossref Cited-by logo