Incompetencia cervical: diagnóstico y tratamiento

Authors

  • Alvaro Monterrosa Castro Universidad de Cartagena. Colombia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18597/rcog.1609

Keywords:

Cervical cerclaje, cervical incompetence, McDonald technique, Shirodkar technique, abdominal cervical isthmic cerclaje, repeled spontaneus abortion, habitual abortion, preterm birth

Abstract

La incompetencia cervical es una causa relativamente poco frecuente de pérdida gestacional, que se considera se ha sobrediagnosticado, más sinembargo es una importante razón para aborto repetido en el segundo trimestre de la gestación. El diagnóstico debe sustentarse en los antecedentes obstétricos y tratar de evidenciar su existencia de forma preconcepcional para simultáneamente descartar otras causas de pérdidas repetidas. Alcanzada la gestación y de forma temprana debe realizarse cerclaje cervical, utilizando técnica de Shirodkar o McDonald, que presentan iguales ratas de supervivencia fetal e iguales ratas de complicaciones. En nuestra experiencia hemos tenido buenos resultados con técnica de McDonald y seda en forma de trenza, como material de sutura, pasando la rata de supervivencia fetal del 10 % pre-cerclaje al 88% post-cerclaje. En aquellas pacientes en que no se puede realizar cerclaje cervical, se recomienda cerclaje cérvico-istmico vía abdominal.

Author Biography

Alvaro Monterrosa Castro, Universidad de Cartagena. Colombia.

Instructor. Departamento de Ginecología y Obstetricia. Facultad de Medicina. Universidad de Cartagena. Colombia.

References

Harger HJ. Cervical cerclaje: patient, selection, morbidity and success rates. Clin. Perinatol. 1983; 10: 321-330.

Golan A., Barnan R., Wexler S. Incompetence of the uterine cervix. Obst. Gynecol. Survey 1989; 44(2): 96-107.

Shortle B., Jewelewicz R. Cervical incompetence. Fértil Steril 1989; 52(2): 181-188.

MRC/RGOC. Final Report of the medical research council. Royal collegue of obstetricians and gynecologists multi center randomised trial of cervical cerclaje. British J Obstrical Gynaecol. 1993; 100: 516-523.

Monterrosa A. Incidencia de parto pretérmino y factores de riesgo. Rev. Col. Obstet. Ginecol. 1991; 42(3): 199-207.

McDonald IA. Cerclaje cervical. Ginecología y Obstetricia. Temas actuales. 1980; 3: 461-478.

Fuste P, Deulofen P, Martínez JM et al. Cerclaje cervical con técnica deShirodkar: indicaciones, eficacia y repercusión sobre la gestación. Estudio de 56 casos. Clin. Invest. Gin. Obst. 1993; 20(10): 437-442.

Charles D., Edwards WR. Infection complications of cervical cerclaje. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1981: 141: 1065-1070.

Weissman A., Jakobi P., Zahi S. The effect of cervical cerclage on the course of labor. Obstet. Gynecol. 1990; 76(2): 168-171.

Austin KL. Cerclaje cervical. Rev. Med. Panamá. 1993; 1892: 79-87.

Michaels WH., Montgomery C., Kard J et al. Ultrasound differentiation of the competente from the incompetent cervix: pregnation of preterm delivery. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1986; 154: 537-541.

Larsson G., Grendesell, Gullberg B et al. Outcome of pregnancy after conization. Act. Obst. Gynecol. Scand. 1982; 61: 461-464.

Jewelewicz R. Incompetent cervix. Pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment. Semin. Perinatol. 1991; 15(2): 156-161.

Nzeh DA., Adetoro OO. Sonographic assessment of the competent cervix in pregnancy. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 1992; 37: 179-184.

Shirodkar UN. A new method of operative treatment for habitual abortion in the second trimestre of pregnancy. Antiseptic 1955; 52: 229-235.

McDonald IA. Suture of the cervix for inevitable miscarriage. J. Obstet. Gynaecol Br Empire 1957; 63(3): 346.

Monterrosa A. Cerclaje Cervical con trenza de seda y técnica de McDonald. Unimetro. In Prensa.

Ayhan A., Mercan R., Tuncer ZC et al. Post concepcional cervical cerclaje. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 1993; 42: 243-246, 352.

Branch W. Intervenciones quirúrgicas para la insuficiencia cervical. Clínicas Obstétricas y Ginecológicas 1986; 2: 305-324.

Zlatnik FJ, Burmeinster LF. Interval evolution of the cervix for predicting pregnancy outcome and diagnosing cervical incompetence. J. Reprod. Med. 1993; 38(5): 365-369.

Hricak H., Chang YC., Cann CE et al. Cervical incompetence Preliminary evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology 1990; 174: 821-826.

Michaels WH., Schereiber FR., Podgett RJ et al. Ultrasound surveillance of the cervix in term gestations: management of cervical incompetency. Obst. Gynecol. 1991; 78(5): 739-744.

O’Lary JH., Ferrel RE. Comparison of ultrasonographic and digital cervical evaluation. Obstet. Gynecol. 1986; 68: 718-724.

Ayers J WT., DeGrood RM., Compton Ea et al. Sonographic evaluation of cervical length in pregnancy of preterm cervical effacement in patients atriesk for premature delivery. Obstet. Gynecol. 1988; 71: 939-944.

Chung TK., Hoines CJ., Kon D et al. Transvaginal sonography in the diagnosis and management of cervical incompetence. Gynecol. Obst. Invest 1993; 36(1): 59-61.

Herman GE. Notes on emmets operation as a prevention of abortion. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Br. Commounw 1902; 2: 256.

Chil GG. Sterility and concepción appleton century crofts New York, 1922; 174-187.

Palmer R., Lacomme M. Ladeance de l’orifice interne cause d’avortemenst a repetition une observation de dechirire cervico isthnique reporce chirirgicalement avec cesation a terme consecutive. Gynecol. Obstet. 1948; 47: 905.

Lash AF., Lash A. Habitual abortion. The incompetent internal os of the cervix. Am. J. Obstet. Ginecol. 1950; 59(1): 68-72.

Lash Af., Lash A. Incompetent internal os of the cervix. Diagnosis and treatment. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1957; 79: 346-350.

McCulloch B., Bergen S., Pielet B et al. McDonald cerclaje under pudendal nerve block. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1993; 168(2): 499-502.

Benson RC., Durfee RB. Transabdominal cervico-uterine cerclaje during pregnancy for the treatment of cervical incompetency Obstet. Gynecol. 1965; 25: 145-149.

Mahrah M. Transabdominal cervical cerclaje during pregnancy. A modified technique. Obstet. Gynecol. 1987; 502: 502.

Watkin R A. Transabdominal cervico uterine suture. Aust Nz J Obstet. Gynaecol. 1972; 12: 62.

Novy JM. Transabdominal cervico istmic cerclage for the management of repetitive abortion and premature delivery. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1982; 143: 44.

Van-Donget PW., Nijhuis JG. Transabdominal cerclege. Eur J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 1991; 41(2): 97-104.

Novy JM. Transabdominal cervico-istmic cerclage: a reapproisal 25 year after ist introduction. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1991; 164(6): 1635-1642.

Treadwel MC., Bonsteen RA., Bottoms SF. Prognostic factors and complication rates for cervical cerclage: a review of 482 cases. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1991; 165(3): 555-558.

McDougall J., Siddle N. Emergency cervical cerclaje. Obst. Gynecol. Survey 1992; 46(6): 379-380.

Novy MJ., Haymond J., Nicholson M. Schirodkar cerclaje in amultifactorial approach to the patient with advanced cervical changes. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1990; 162(6): 1412-1420.

Golomb J., Ben-Chaim JS., Goldwasser B et al. Conservative treatment of a vesicocervical fistula resulting from Shirodkar cervical cerclage. J. Urol. 1993; 149(4): 833-834.

Ansan Ah., Reynolds RA. Cervical incompetence. A reviews. J. reprod. Med. 1987; 32: 161-170.

Wetchler BV., Brick J. Safety of outpatient cerclaje. J. Reprod. Med. 1990; 35: 243-246.

Trehan Ak., Kenney A., Fergusson IL. Outpatient cervical cerclaje. The Lancet 1992; 339(13): 1482.

Angel JL., Pietrantoni M., O’ Brien WF et al. Cervical cerclaje in early pregnancy. J. perinatol. 1991; 11(3): 258-261.

Romero R., González R., Sepulveda W. Infection and labor. VIII. Microbial invasion of cervical incompetence: prevalence and clinical significance. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1992; 167 (4, ptl): 1086-1091.

Cromblehome WR., Monkoff HL., Delke I et al. Cervical cerclaje: an aggresive approach to threatened or recurrent pregnancy wastage. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1983; 146: 168-172.

How to Cite

1.
Monterrosa Castro A. Incompetencia cervical: diagnóstico y tratamiento. Rev. colomb. obstet. ginecol. [Internet]. 1995 Jun. 30 [cited 2024 May 18];46(2):105-8. Available from: https://revista.fecolsog.org/index.php/rcog/article/view/1609

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

1995-06-30
QR Code

Altmetric

Article metrics
Abstract views
Galley vies
PDF Views
HTML views
Other views
Crossref Cited-by logo