Reanastomosis tubárica y otras técnicas microquirúrgicas e infertilidad
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18597/rcog.2506Resumen
La esterilización quirúrgica en la pasada década se ha incorporado como método masivo de control de la fertilidad. Hasta 1985 se habían esterilizado por esta técnica, 6 millones de mujeres norteamericanas por debajo de 30 años de edad. En nuestro medio el 65% de las mujeres en edad reproductiva planifican; de estas el 18% lo hacen por métodos quirúrgicos, 16% usan anticonceptivos orales y el 11% utilizan el DIU (1, 2, 3). En Norteamérica se ha estimado que alrededor del 1% de estas pacientes, buscan reanastomosis - 500.000 anualmente-. La razón usual para solicitud de reanastomosis tubárica es la separación conyugal y una nueva unión (4,5). En la actualidad la esterilización quirúrgica es el método más usado en mujeres por encima de 30 años de edad (2).
Biografía del autor/a
Gustavo Gómez Tabares, Universidad del Valle
Profesor Asociado Departamento de Obstetricia y Ginecología Facultad de Salud Universidad del Valle Director Clínica Endocrinología e Infertilidad Hospital Universitario del Valle
Silvio Heriberto Estela González, Universidad del Cauca
Residente Obstetricia y Ginecología Universidad del Cauca
Rotante por la Clínica de Endocrinología e Infertilidad - 1988 Departamento de Obstetricia y Ginecología Universidad del Valle
Referencias bibliográficas
ORY H W., FORREST O J., LINCOLN R: Making choices: evaluating the health risks and benefits, of birth control methods. New York. The Alan Guttmacher Institue, 1983.
Center for Disease Control: Surgical Sterilization Surveillance, Tubal Sterilization Summary 1970 - 1975. Atlanta Georgia, July, 1979.
Encuesta de Dermografia y Salud en Colombia. 1986. GOMEL V,: Profile of women requesting reversal of sterilization. Fértil Steril 30: 39,1978.
WISTON RML: Why 103 women saked for reversal of sterilization. Br. Med. J. 2:305,1977.
BLANDAU R J.: Observing ovulation and egg transport. In Methods in Mammalian embriology, Ed. J. C. Daniel Jr. San Francisco, W. H. Freeman, 1971, p.1
OKAMURA H.,MORIKAWA H.,OSHIMA M. MAN-i M., NISHIMURA T.: A morphologic study of mesotubarium ovarica in the human Obstet gynecol 49: 197, 1977.
OKAMURA H.,MORIKAWA H., OSHIMA M. Man-i M., NISHIMURA T: A morphological and physiological study of mesotubarium in humans. Int J. Fértil 22: 179,1978.
EDDY C. A., GARCIA RG, KRAEMER D.C., PAURSTEIN C J.: Detailed time course of ovum transport in the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta). Biol. Reprod. 13: 363, 1975.
ODOR DL. BLANDAU R J.: Egg transport over the fimbrial surface of the rabbit oviduct under experimental condictions. Fértil Steril 24: 292, 1973.
HALBERT SA PATTON DL: Ovum pick-up following fimbriectomy and infundibular salpingostomy in rabbits. J. Reprod. Med. 26: 299,1981.
HALBERT SA., McCOMB P F., PATTON DL.: Function and structure of the rabbit oviduct following fimbriectomy. I Distal ampullary Salpingostomy. Fértil Steril 35: 349, 1981.
HALBERT SA., McCOMB PF : Function and structure of the rabbit oviduct following fimbriectomy. II Proximal ampullary salpingostomy. Fértil Steril 35: 355,1981.
GADDUM-ROSSE P., BLANDAU R J.: In vitro studies on ciliary activity within the oviducts of the rabbit and pig. Am.J. Anat. 136: 91,1973.
JANSEN R P S.: Cycles changes in the human fallopian tube isthmus and their functional importance. Am.J. Obstet. Gynecol. 136: 292,1980.
HAFEZ ESE. Gamete transport. In: HAFEZ ESE, EVANS TN., eds. Human reproduction conception and contraception. New York: Harper and Row, 1973: 85.
HODGSON B J., TALO A., PAUERSTEIN C J.: Oviductal surrogate movement: inter-relation with muscular activity. Biol. Reprod. 16: 394, 1977.
TALO A. PULKKINEN M 0.: Electrical activity in the human oviduct during menstrual cycle. Am J. Obstet Gynecol 142: 135, 1982.
GADDUM - ROSSE O, BLANDAU R J., THIERSCH J B.: Ciliary activity in the human and macaca nemestrina oviduct. Am J. Anat 138: 269, 1973.
McCOMB P F., HALBERT SA., GOMEL V: Pregnancy, ciiiary transport, and the reversed ampullary segment of the rabbit fallopian tube. Fértil Steril 34: 386, 1980.
CROXATTO H B, ORTIZ ME., DIAZ S. HESS R., BALMACEDA J, CROXATTO H D.: Studies on the duration of egg transport by the human oviduct. II Ovum location at various interval following luteinizing hormone peak. Am J. Obstet Gynecol 132-. 629.
TALO A, PULKKINEN M.: Electrical activity in the human oviduct during menstrual cycle. Am J. Obstet Gynecol 142: 135, 1982.
DONNEZ J., CASANAS-ROUX F, CAPRASSE J. FERRIN J. THOMAS K: Cycles changes in ciliation, cell height, and mitotic activity in human tubal epithelium during reproductive life. Fértil Steril 43: 554, 1985.
PULKKINEN 0 M., TALO A: Tubal physilogic consideration in ectopic pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 30: 164, 1987.
SIEGLER A M.: Tubal plastic surgery; the past, the present and the future. Obstet Gynecol Surv 15: 680, 1960.
PEARL R. SURFACE F.M.: Resection and end-to-end anatomosis of the oviduc in the hen without loss of function. Am J. Physiol 22:57, 1908.
CHRISTIAN S.L., SANDERSON E.L: A new method of anatomosing the ovarian tube or the vas deferens. JAMA 61: 2157, 1913.
SIEGLER A., HULKA J..PERETZ A: Reversibility of female sterilization. Fértil Steril 43: 499, 1985. HOLDEN F C., SOVAK F.W.: Reconstruction of the oviducts: an improved technic with report of cases. Am J. Obstet Gynecol 24: 684, 1932.
PALMER R: Salpingostomy: a critical study of 396 personal cases operated upon without polyethylene tubing. Proc R. Soc Med. 53: 357, 1960.
SIEGLER A.M.: Salpingoplasty: Classification and report of 115 operations. Obstet Gynecol 34: 339, 1969.
ROCK J.A., TAKAYAMA K.P. MARTIN E.J., WOODRUFF J.D., JONES HW J.R.: Factors influencing the success of salpingostomy technics for distal fimbrial obstruction. Obstet Gynecol 52: 591, 1978.
WINTON M.R.L.: Microsurgery of the fallopian tube: from fantasy to reality. Fértil Steril 34: 521, 1980.
GOMEL V: Clinical results of infertility microsurgery, in Female Infertility, Ed. by PG Crosignani, B.L. Rubin. London, Academic Press 1980 P. 77.
DeCHERNEY A.H., KASE N: A comparison of treatment for biletral fimbrial occlusion. Fértil Steril 35: 162, 1981.
KISTNER R.W., PATTON G.W.: Atlas of Infertility Surgery. Boston, Littl, Brown and Co, 1975.
PFEFFER W.H. Adjuvants in tubal surgery. Fértil Steril 33: 245, 1980.
JARRETT J.,DAWOOD Y: Adhesion formation and uterine tube healing in the rabbit: A controlled study of the effects of ibuprofen and flurbiprofen. Am J. Obstet Gynecol 155: 1186, 1986.
DUNPHY J.E., UDUPA K.N.: Clinical and histochemical sequences in the normal healing of wounds. New Engl J. Med. 20: 847, 1955.
WEISSMANN G.: Prostanglandins in acute inflamation. Kalamazoo, Michigan: Scoe Publication. The Upjohn Co. 1: 29, 1980.
BATEMAN BG., NUNLEY WC., KITCHIN J.D.: Prevention of postoperative peritoneal adhesion with ibuprofen. Fértil steril 38: 107, 1982.
HOLTZ G: Faillure of a non steroidal anti-inflamatory agent (ibuprofen) to inhibit peritoneal adhesion reformation after lysis. Fértil Steril 37: 582, 1982.
O’BRIEN W.F., DRAKE T.S. BIBRO M.C.: The use of ibuprofen and dexamethasone in the prevention of postoperative adhesion formation. Obstet Gynecol 60: 373, 1982.
SIEGLER A., HULKA J. PERETZ A.: Reversibility of female sterilization. Fértil Steril 43: 499, 1985.
PHILLIPS J.M., HULKA B., KEITH 1, KEITH D: American association of Gynecologic Laparoscopist 1976 membership survey. J. Reprod Med. 2: 13.
ROCK J.A. GUZICK D.S., KATZ E., ZACUR H.A., KING T.M.: tubal anastomosis: pregnancy success following reversal of Falope ring or monopolar cautery sterilization Fértil Steril 48:13, 1987.
ROCK J.A., BERGQUIST C.A., ZACUR H.A., PARMLEY T.H., GUZICK D.S., JONES H.W., Jr: Tubal anatomosis following unipolar cautery. Fértil Steril 37: 611: 1982.
ROCK J.A., PARMLEY T. H., KING T.M., LAUFE L.E., Hsu B.C.: Endometriosis and the development of tuboperitoneal fistulas after tubal ligation. Fértil Steril 35: 16, 1981.
GOMEL V: Microsurgery in Female Infertility. Boston, Littl, Brown & Co. 1983 p. 240.
Pelvic Infection: acute pelvic inflamatory disease. In Novak’s Texbook of Gynecology, Eds Novak E.R., Jones G.S. Jones H. W. Baltimore. The Williams & Wilkins Co. 1980 p. 348.
VASQUEZ G. WINSTON MRL, BOECKX W, GORDTS S. BROSENS IA: The epithelium of human hydrosalpinx: a light optical and scanning electron microscopic study BR. J. Obstet Gynecol 90: 764, 1983.
DONNEZ J. CASANAS-ROUX F: Prognostic factor of fimbrial microsurgery. Fértil Steril 42:200, 1986.
BATEMAN B., NUNLEY W., KITCHIN J: Surgical management of distal tubal obstruction are we making progress? Fértil Steril 48: 523, 1987.
BOER- MEISEL M.E., TE VELDE E.R., HABBEMA JDK, KARDAUM JWPF: Predicting the pregnancy outcome in patients treated for hydrosalpinx: a prospective study. Fértil Steril 45: 23, 1986.
TULANDI T. VILOS G.A.: A comparison between laser surgery and electrosurgery for bilateral hydrosalpinx: a 2 year follow-up. Fértil Steril 44: 846, 1985.
DANIELL J.F., DIAMOND M.P., McLAUGHLIN D.S., MARTIN D.C., FESTE J., SURRE MW., FRIEDMAN S., VAUGHN W.K: Clinical results of terminal salpingostomy with the use of the C02 laser: report of the intraabdominal laser study group. Fértil Steril 45: 175, 1986.
FRANTZEN C., SCHLOSSER H-W: Microsurgery and postinfectious tubal infertility. Fértil Steril 38: 397, 1983.
PATTON G.W., Jr.: Pregnancy outcome following microsurgical fimbrioplasty. Fértil Steril 37: 150.
DONNEZ J. CASANAS - ROUX F: Prognostic factors of fimbrial microsurgery. Fértil Steril 46: 200, 1986.
KELLY R.W., ROBERTS D.K.: Experience with the carbon dioxide laser in gynecologic microsurgery. AM J. Obstet Gynecol 145: 585, 1983.
Cómo citar
Descargas
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Estadísticas de artículo | |
---|---|
Vistas de resúmenes | |
Vistas de PDF | |
Descargas de PDF | |
Vistas de HTML | |
Otras vistas |