Motivos de retiro de implantes Norplant

Norplant Contraceptive Subdermal Implants: Manual for Clinicians-New York. The Population Council 1990; 38.

Shoupe D., Mishell DR. Norplant Subdermal Implant System for Longterm Contraception. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1989; 160: 1286.

Who is a candidate for Norplant? Ballagh S.A.; Mishell DR. JC Western Journal ofMedicine 1992; 156: 649.

Norplant insertion and removal. Monaghan J.C. Patient Gave 1992; 26: 231-4.237.

Innovations in Contraception: The Norplant System Klaisle C.M: Wysocki S. Naa Gogs Clinical. Issues in perinatal and womens health Nursing 1992; 3: 267-279.

Darney PD., Atkinson E., Tanner S. y Col. Acceptance and perceptions of Norplant among users in San Francisco. U.S.A. Stud. Fam. Plann. 1990; 21: 152.

Observación del autor.

Acceptability of Norplant implant for fertility regulation in Singapore. Singh K; Viegas OA; Fong YF; Rutnann SS; Contraception 1992; 45:39-47.

Assessing potential demand for Norplant implant in Sri Lanka. Thapa S; Lampe P.; Abeykoon A. Advances in Contraception. 1992; 8: 115-128.

Lynn MM., Holdcroft C. Nurse Practitioner 1992; 17: 85-89.

Idem, 5.

Shoupe D., Mishell DR., Bopp B., Fielding M. The Significance of bleeding paterns in Norplant implant users. Obstet. Ginecol. 1991; 77: 256. Idem-9.

Nigerian Study offers insights on the successful introduction of Norplant. Adetunji A; Landry E. AVSC New 1992; 30: 1, 3 Idem 5.

A subdermal progestin implant for long term contraception. Abramowicz (ed) The medicalletter on Drugs and therapeutics 1991; 839: 17.

Correspondence on Norplant (Letters) Foundes A. Issues in Reproductive and Genetic Engineering 1992; 5: 67-69.