DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18597/rcog.68

Is the high proportion of caesarean sections justified? Approaching this world trend

Alejandro Antonio Bautista-Charry, Ariel Iván Ruiz-Parra

Resumen


From our vantage point in the front lines, we have witnessed the speed at which our specialty has been moving towards the future. Several years ago, as we started our training in obstetrics, we came to Instituto Materno Infantil, an institution with a long history, long-standing experience and a path that offered hope for a professional career faced with rapid transformations driven by technological breakthroughs. The practice at the time was that of great obstetrical manoeuvres, semiological examination, and difficult case discussions. Maternal mortality back then was close to 222 deaths for every 100,000 live births (1), as a result of a high frequency of eclampsia and associated neurological morbidity, and also complications of abortions performed in unsafe conditions. However, we had dreams of saving lives and we were there to see the birth of perinatology, a door opener to the foetus and neonate as patients in their own right. Perinatology looked into foetal wellbeing and moved steadily towards foetal surgery. Thus, perinatal medicine joined genetic engineering in its quest to arrive at the perfect human clone.

Texto completo:

PDF (English)

Referencias


Gómez-Sánchez PI. Mortalidad Materna en el Instituto Materno Infantil. Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol. 1993;44:39-47.

Alarcón-Nivia MA, Sepúlveda-Agudelo J, Alarcón-Amaya IC. Las parteras, patrimonio de la humanidad. Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol. 2011;62:188-195.

Bartolomé de las Casas. Historia de las Indias. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica; 1986.

República de Colombia. Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística (DANE) [accessed on July 26th, 2014]. Available at: http//:www.dane.gov.co/.

Profamilia. Encuesta Nacional de Demografía y Salud ENDS 2010 [accessed on July 26th, 2014] Available at: http://www.profamilia.org.co/encuestas/Profamilia/

Peralta-Abello MT, Díaz-Cruz LA, Bautista-Charry AA. Pasado, presente y futuro de la operación cesárea. En: Náñez-Burbano H, Ruiz-Parra AI, editores. Texto de Obstetricia y Perinatología, una contribución a la enseñanza del arte, ciencia y tecnología. Santafé de Bogotá: Pharmacia Upjohn; 1999. p. 125-136.

D’Souza R, Arulkumaran S. To ‘C´ or not to ´C´? Caesarean

delivery upon maternal request a review of facts, figures and guidelines. J Perinat Med. 2013;41:5-15.

Rubio-Romero JA, Fonseca-Pérez JE, Molina-Giraldo S, Buitrago-Leal M, Zuleta-Tobón JJ, Ángel-Muller E et al. Racionalización del uso de la cesárea en Colombia. Consenso de la Federación Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecología (Fecolsog) y la Federación Colombiana de Perinatología (Fecopen). Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol. 2014;65:47-74.

Countries Compared by Health - Births by caesarean section.

International Statistics at NationMaster.com. OECD

Health Data 2003 and OECD Health Data 2002. Aggregates

compiled by NationMaster. Disponible en: http://www.

nationmaster.com/country-info/stats/Health/Births-bycaesarean-

section

Ribeiro VS, Figueiredo FP, Silva AA, Bettiol H, Batista RF, Coimbra LC, et al. Why are the rates of cesarean section in Brazil higher in more developed cities than in less developed ones? Braz J Med Biol Res. 2007;40(9):1211-20.

Niino Y. The increasing cesarean rate globally and what we can do about it. Biosci Trends. 2011;5:139-50.

Sánchez-Torres F. Reflexiones éticas en torno a la operación cesárea. Rev Obstet Ginecol Venezuela. 1991;51:75-86.

Gómez-Palacino JA. ¿Qué hacer para reducir las tasas de cesárea en Colombia? En: Ginecoobstetricia temas seleccionados. Bogotá: Giro Editores; 2011. p. 325-335.

Cobo E. Tasas de cesáreas en la Fundación Clínica Valle del Lilly: ¿es posible reducirlas? Colombia Med. 1998;29:53-61.

Odent M. La cesárea ¿problema o solución? Barcelona: La Liebre de Marzo; 2005.

Odent M, La cientificación del amor. Buenos Aires: Creavida; 2001.

Rodrigañez-Bustos C. Pariremos con placer, apuntes sobre la recuperación del útero espástico y la energía sexual femenina. Buenos Aires: Madreselva; 2010.


comments powered by Disqus

Métricas de artículo

Cargando métricas ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM




Copyright (c) 2015 Revista Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecología

Licencia de Creative Commons
Este obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional.

ISSN Impreso       0034-7434 

ISSN Electrónico   2463-0225

https://doi.org/10.18597/issn.0034-7434