Carta al editor acerca de "Estudio fenomenológico sobre la experiencia vivida por mujeres con síndrome de ovario poliquístico en Chile"
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18597/rcog.4506Palabras clave:
Estudio fenomenológico, Síndrome de ovario poliquístico, Chile, Obstetricia, GinecologíaResumen
Carta al Editor
Referencias bibliográficas
Pino Le Magueresse P, Maliqueo Navarro P, Carvajal B. Estudio fenomenológico sobre la experiencia vivida por mujeres con síndrome de ovario poliquístico en Chile. Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol. 2025;76:4249. https://doi.org/10.18597/rcog.4249
Alsaigh R, Coyne I. Doing a hermeneutic phenomenology research underpinned by Gadamer’s philosophy: A framework to facilitate data analysis. Int J Qual Methods. 2021;20:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211047820
Ken H. Hermeneutic phenomenological analysis: The “possibility” beyond “actuality” in thematic analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2016;73(7): 1757–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13255
Creswell JW, Poth CN. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. 4th ed. Sage Publications; 2018.
Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1753–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444
Flick U. An Introduction to Qualitative Research. 6th ed. SAGE Publications; 2018.
Gálvez J, Borda-Niño Á. Consideraciones para el muestreo en investigación cualitativa en salud. Rev Fac Nac Salud Pública. 2022;40:e343780. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfnsp.v40n1e343780
Patton MQ. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. 4th ed. Sage Publications; 2015.
Berger R. Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qual Res. 2015;15(2):219–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112468475
D’Cruz H, Gillingham P. Reflexivity in social work practice and research: Making a case for critical reflection. Qual Soc Work. 2017;16(3):297–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325015612439
Birt L, Scott S, Cavers D, Campbell C, Walter F. Member checking: A tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation? Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1802–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316654870
O’Connor H, Madge C. Online interviewing. In: Fielding N, Lee RM, Blank G, editors. The SAGE Handbook of Online Research Methods. 2nd ed. London: SAGE Publications; 2017. p. 416–34. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473957992.n24
Hennink M, Kaiser BN. Sampling in qualitative research: Insights from an overview of the methods literature. Qual Health Res. 2022;32(4):681–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323211022515
Liamputtong P. Research Methods in Health: Foundations for Evidence-Based Practice. 3rd ed. Oxford University Press; 2019.
Nowell LS, Norris JM, White DE, Moules NJ. Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. Int J Qual Methods. 2017;16(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Cómo citar
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Federación Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecología (FECOLGOS)

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
| Estadísticas de artículo | |
|---|---|
| Vistas de resúmenes | |
| Vistas de PDF | |
| Descargas de PDF | |
| Vistas de HTML | |
| Otras vistas | |











