Carta al editor acerca de "Estudio fenomenológico sobre la experiencia vivida por mujeres con síndrome de ovario poliquístico en Chile"

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18597/rcog.4506

Palabras clave:

Estudio fenomenológico, Síndrome de ovario poliquístico, Chile, Obstetricia, Ginecología

Resumen

Carta al Editor

Referencias bibliográficas

Pino Le Magueresse P, Maliqueo Navarro P, Carvajal B. Estudio fenomenológico sobre la experiencia vivida por mujeres con síndrome de ovario poliquístico en Chile. Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol. 2025;76:4249. https://doi.org/10.18597/rcog.4249

Alsaigh R, Coyne I. Doing a hermeneutic phenomenology research underpinned by Gadamer’s philosophy: A framework to facilitate data analysis. Int J Qual Methods. 2021;20:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211047820

Ken H. Hermeneutic phenomenological analysis: The “possibility” beyond “actuality” in thematic analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2016;73(7): 1757–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13255

Creswell JW, Poth CN. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. 4th ed. Sage Publications; 2018.

Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1753–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444

Flick U. An Introduction to Qualitative Research. 6th ed. SAGE Publications; 2018.

Gálvez J, Borda-Niño Á. Consideraciones para el muestreo en investigación cualitativa en salud. Rev Fac Nac Salud Pública. 2022;40:e343780. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfnsp.v40n1e343780

Patton MQ. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. 4th ed. Sage Publications; 2015.

Berger R. Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qual Res. 2015;15(2):219–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112468475

D’Cruz H, Gillingham P. Reflexivity in social work practice and research: Making a case for critical reflection. Qual Soc Work. 2017;16(3):297–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325015612439

Birt L, Scott S, Cavers D, Campbell C, Walter F. Member checking: A tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation? Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1802–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316654870

O’Connor H, Madge C. Online interviewing. In: Fielding N, Lee RM, Blank G, editors. The SAGE Handbook of Online Research Methods. 2nd ed. London: SAGE Publications; 2017. p. 416–34. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473957992.n24

Hennink M, Kaiser BN. Sampling in qualitative research: Insights from an overview of the methods literature. Qual Health Res. 2022;32(4):681–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323211022515

Liamputtong P. Research Methods in Health: Foundations for Evidence-Based Practice. 3rd ed. Oxford University Press; 2019.

Nowell LS, Norris JM, White DE, Moules NJ. Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. Int J Qual Methods. 2017;16(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

Cómo citar

1.
Miranda Castillo JL, Antezana Quispe JL. Carta al editor acerca de "Estudio fenomenológico sobre la experiencia vivida por mujeres con síndrome de ovario poliquístico en Chile". Rev. colomb. obstet. ginecol. [Internet]. 11 de septiembre de 2025 [citado 16 de abril de 2026];76(3). Disponible en: https://revista.fecolsog.org/index.php/rcog/article/view/4506

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Descargas

Publicado

2025-09-11

Número

Sección

Cartas al Editor

Métricas

Estadísticas de artículo
Vistas de resúmenes
Vistas de PDF
Descargas de PDF
Vistas de HTML
Otras vistas
Escanea para compartir
QR Code
Crossref Cited-by logo

Algunos artículos similares: